SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Summit Technology (BEAM)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1386 16 0 BEAM
Emcee:  Keith Fauci Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
261 Humm, Just wondering were the Laser Vision Centers the centers that Summit wereJohn Liu-7/21/1997
260 John, the Laser Vision Centers were a major money loser and that is why BEAM deJames Fink-7/21/1997
259 Does anyone know if the Laser Vision Centers a drag on Summit's earnings orJohn Liu-7/21/1997
258 The $4.5 million patent settlement payment should have yielded a gain of about James Fink-7/21/1997
257 Looks like #2 point of my last post just came true, biz.yahoo.comstock talk-7/21/1997
256 There is profit in what you say. I speculate in these laser stocks but I alwaysyosid-7/19/1997
255 FWIW, three things were clearly talked about at the shareholders meeting. 1. Tstock talk-7/18/1997
254 Finally, someone who understands. I've been saying what you have posted siyosid-7/18/1997
253 Pat, Doing better with CRUS? Regards, Patriotmargin_man-7/18/1997
252 VISX reported a four cent loss after the close on Wednesday. This included a 2James Fink-7/18/1997
251 This MP/MZ PRK sounds interesting. I'm going to look into this. Also, over yosid-7/16/1997
250 I believe MP/MZ PRK is going through U.S. studies now, and may be considered byJim Mac-7/15/1997
249 I hear ya, brother.Jim Mac-7/15/1997
248 Do you have any idea how close Multizone PRK is to USA approval? I don't yosid-7/15/1997
247 I don't understand why some on this board think that Summit machines are eqJohn Binford, Jr.-7/15/1997
246 Amen, John Binford, Amen! Jim Mac-7/15/1997
245 You should get that book, BEYOND GLASSES! and read it very well...especially ifJim Mac-7/15/1997
244 Dr. Donald Johnson: "Multizone PRK strongly competes with LASIK for high lJim Mac-7/15/1997
243 Dr. Marguerite McDonald: "There's nothing better than a good LASIK andJim Mac-7/15/1997
242 I agree with most of that. Summit needs to get its act together, like VisX. Jim Mac-7/15/1997
241 BTW, that gimbel.com website only lists half the risk factors for LASIK...If yoJim Mac-7/15/1997
240 Thanks for the info. I've seen several of those already, and they form parJim Mac-7/15/1997
239 My information comes from sources other than the VisX website.Jim Mac-7/15/1997
238 The fuss is that a cadre of VISX stockholders is trying to drive all competitioyosid-7/15/1997
237 PRK, LASIK, RK, AK, and ALK for correcting myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. BubbaFred-7/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):