SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
27311 121 0 VLNCQ
Emcee:  da_cheif™ Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
26261"...breakeven revenue of $10MM/quarter..."?? Is this your prediction oP. Ramamoorthy-2/14/2004
26260Wolanchuk's credibility on how many customers he has been able to hold onto MGV-2/13/2004
26259I'm sure they do hope to get to cash-flow breakeven. My only comment is thaPeter Groninger-2/13/2004
26258No chit eh....still with the same pooor customers after 15 years....lololol...mda_cheif™-2/13/2004
26257My guess is that they hope to achieve breakeven sometime this Fall. They are plP. Ramamoorthy-2/13/2004
26256Wolanchuk has a losing trade for every day of the week. ANTS, WAVC, VMII, WSTL,MGV-2/13/2004
26255Wolanchuk charges for advice that lose other people's money any time. He haMGV-2/13/2004
26254hes gotst cawledge and dr of juris prudence in chit.....sitz in a cubicle playinda_cheif™-2/13/2004
26253Marks 2 posts supporting his home town drew.corrupt.netda_cheif™-2/13/2004
26252Mark G Visnic does this on company time...lmazoffda_cheif™-2/13/2004
26251The stock is down around 90% from the time Wolanchuk was touting it around $41 aMGV-2/13/2004
26250<b>FY2004 3Q conference call notes (February 12, 2004)</b> KevinP. Ramamoorthy-2/13/2004
26249John: Thanks for the detailed notes. Also, I wonder if anyone has any comment oGeorge8-2/12/2004
26248VLNC 3Q Conference Call Transcript: Kevin M started off by reiterating what wasJohn Curtis-2/12/2004
26247Ahhh.....thanks for the advice....the stock is now up 1000%...good i didnt listeda_cheif™-2/12/2004
26246Noooooooooway.....dude....da_cheif™-2/12/2004
26245And cost of goods sold grew more than revenue. However, because cost of goods sLarry Brubaker-2/12/2004
26244I'm not a bean counter (thank God), but I was personally rather disappointedPeter Groninger-2/12/2004
26243You're welcome Ram. And I should have re-read your notes first. ;-) <John Curtis-2/12/2004
26242John, Thanks for posting the link. <b>We already know </b> that thiP. Ramamoorthy-2/12/2004
26241Ram, et.al: Speaking of Demo2004: I posted this earlier on the Yahoo thread: John Curtis-2/11/2004
26240Jacques, "...new EVI order for K-Charge batteries naturally did not includeP. Ramamoorthy-2/11/2004
26239Jacques: Thanks for the interesting article. As you know I'm very high on John Curtis-2/7/2004
26238John: There is a very interesting article in today's N.Y. Times discussing aJacques Tenzel-2/6/2004
26237so whats your opinion.....ur humble sad sack servant.....da_cheif™-2/6/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News