SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTEL FOR TECHNICIANS
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1513 9 0 INTC
Emcee:  jmac Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
263 X- I follow an indicator called the STOCHRSI- stochastics of Relative Strength gonzongo-3/16/1997
262 MSFT is holding up because it has no competition and is considered a safe havenAlec Epting-3/16/1997
261 Dear X: You said: "So I think a selling climax is shaping up for the weekgonzongo-3/16/1997
260 Hi All, I mentioned the two ways I thought this downtrend might be resolved inxstuckey-3/16/1997
259 Yep- Gary I know people who buy/sell only on TA and never look at fundies and gonzongo-3/16/1997
258 Thanks for the comments Andy. That's my dilemma - I agree with you that inGary105-3/16/1997
257 gary_ I agree that we are in a pullback and that 89 is possible although I woulgonzongo-3/16/1997
256 Can you tell me why msft holds its position so well, when everyone else tanks. li li-3/16/1997
255 Jim, Thanks for your view - the risk/reward ration is not there for writing naNancy-3/16/1997
254 Ray, Finally.... someone who is not looking at intc through rosy glasses. I liGary105-3/16/1997
253 This is dejavu (sp?) all over again! I've been following INTC since winterWilliam Y. Huang-3/16/1997
252 Nancy, My reply was based upon your questioning your put selling strategy ? IJim Cash-3/16/1997
251 In FA, Intel looks even worse than its current TA. "AMD Readies Its K-6 CRayW-3/15/1997
250 X, your stategy seems fine to me. I am more bearish because of the technicalsGary105-3/15/1997
249 <b>We never stop learning, the market can humble us quicker than I ditch gonzongo-3/15/1997
248 jmac, I think you are in less trouble than you may think, or at least for a sxstuckey-3/15/1997
247 <i><b>I am posting here to help encourage discussion, not to be rigSteelBlueIce-3/15/1997
246 Gary, I believe the purpose of this board is to is to use our collective wisdoxstuckey-3/15/1997
245 You do have a point about shorting INTC. But I try not to short stocks (like IChi-X-3/15/1997
244 Jim, What are you talking about ? I am thinking about write naked puts on INTNancy-3/15/1997
243 Dave, Check INTC weekly chart, there is no resistance until 80 once INTC dropsRayW-3/15/1997
242 JMAC, You might want to buy as many puts as you could afford to hedge your holRayW-3/15/1997
241 To ALL: I think that the great Jugernaut (INTC) Momentum play is now time Dave Kosmayer-3/15/1997
240 Jim, Patterns are one of the most subjective forms of TA. The top line on an Jim Cash-3/15/1997
239 I just read two posts where an expected bounce was to come so that one could orjmac-3/15/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News