SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Gold & Gold Stock Analysis
An SI Board Since August 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
29622 477 0 GLD
Emcee:  Kirk © Type:  Moderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
26325Nice posting of charts, Marcos! MOST ESPECIALLY the bottom P&F chart, whicIngotWeTrust-10/5/2011
26324Welcome back -- myopic as ever, but nice to see you sharing your views. If the mGST2010/5/2011
26323$1450 +/- seems possible. The pullback in 2008 lasted around 9 months. [graphicritical_mass110/5/2011
26322[graphic] . When i find myself in times of wonder, then the weekly comes to marcos910/5/2011
26321Reading some of the misguided advice on gold lately, I post again. Yesterday golecrire1010/4/2011
26320>>>I cannot recall a time when moves on this order of magnitude took plTommaso210/4/2011
26319I remember when a $5 dollar move in the price of gold would have been called GST-10/4/2011
26318Looks like you got your 170-178 XAU early. But you got it.Jim McMannis-10/4/2011
26317Thanks for filling in for ecr. It's hard to remember to buy without our dediNevada9999-10/4/2011
26316BB coming to the rescue? businessweek.comLand Shark110/4/2011
26315Gang-Raped is more the word.Land Shark-10/4/2011
26314XAU 178 hit. Possibly 3 weeks or better left in the cycle. All support taken outBonefish110/4/2011
26313<b>Gold Market Update</b> <i>In classic fashion gold's brbull_dozer-10/4/2011
26312CME Group Increases Amount Of Gold That Can Be Posted As Performance Bond CollatGST-10/3/2011
26311benwood, thx... appreciate the fix... /eomJimisJim-10/3/2011
26310<Maybe the question should be why don't more Americans have/buy gold?>JimisJim-10/3/2011
26309kitco.com Whenever I get a link that doesn't work, I take a look at it. Inbenwood-10/3/2011
26308If you look outside of the US and more towards Asia I think you may have a diffediddlysquatz-10/3/2011
26307Stock markets down, gold holding up. Gold resuming it's role as something beLand Shark-10/3/2011
26306<Page Cannot Be Found>... link didn't work for me... /eomJimisJim-10/3/2011
26305RE:"Why don't more people have/buy gold?" 1. They don't have Jim McMannis110/3/2011
26304Gold is held by people with a variety of needs: kitco.comGST-10/3/2011
26303Gold up and NGD down. Makes no sense.Oblivious-10/3/2011
26302Why don't more people have/buy gold? Probably because 47% of households withJimisJim-10/3/2011
26301Excellent treatment, especially for anyone who is just now trying to understand Tommaso-10/3/2011
26300<b>In Gold We Trust</b> <i>Now imagine what would happen if gbull_dozer-10/3/2011
26299qatar to spend $10 billion buying up gold mines Subject 58335klinker-10/2/2011
26298I really never had any intention of arbitrating, dominating, or moderating thisTommaso410/1/2011
26297>>>. I asked our I.T. guru if this Cisco company was someone to buy, aTommaso-10/1/2011
26296T, I might add some more too, after we get a strong indication the bottom is inTH-10/1/2011
26295I might even think about adding some more NUGT, given what just happened to goldTommaso110/1/2011
26294T, Damn, I own some of that NUGT. Well, I'm bullish miners, so I roll withTH-10/1/2011
26293Pierre Lassonde says "Don't have to worry for one second" about thTommaso110/1/2011
26292That link you cited had one too may backslashes in it at the beginning I think. maceng2-10/1/2011
26291Weird people coming out of the woodwork. That would seem to argue well for theTommaso-9/30/2011
26290Forgot to add link: materials.proxyvote.com Also, the change takes place 1 DecTommaso-9/30/2011
26289The ETFs NUGT and DUST have just gone from 200% to 300% leverage. Or rather, froTommaso-9/30/2011
26288Thank you for honoring me with your third post of the year 2011.Tommaso-9/30/2011
26287You are not sorry no more than I am about just improving your ignores from 62 toBob Burke109/30/2011
26286Really good article you posted, White. Totally agree that those who are in S.IngotWeTrust19/30/2011
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):