SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
World Affairs Discussion
An SI Board Since June 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3959 17 0
Emcee:  ChinuSFO Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2634You certainly have a vivid imagination. <i>Thanks for falling into my dBrumar89-12/16/2002
2633If they just wanted to surrender they could have just broadcast it on every freqTimF-12/16/2002
2632Of course, I don't have a link. There was no direct formal offer of surrendThomas M.-12/16/2002
2631Thanks for falling into my double trap. -g- You are a racist for rejecting FarThomas M.-12/16/2002
2630Nor human compassion, I see..zonder-12/16/2002
2629no-treason.comTimF-12/13/2002
2628You have a link to a specific direct of offer of surrender with no other conditiTimF-12/13/2002
2627<i> the Survey's opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, andTimF-12/13/2002
2626What "peace offensive"? The attempts to cut a secret separate deal wiBrumar89-12/13/2002
2625Louis Farrakhan's newspaper and The Sudan Foundation say there is no slaveryBrumar89-12/13/2002
2624<< <i>Thus, the majority of the U.S. military leadership was vindicaMachaon-12/13/2002
2623I won't pretend. I'll tell you the truth - i hadn't seen it. "Brumar89-12/13/2002
2622Belgian Company Linked to Rural Slavery in Brazil indybay.org Slavery in BraziThomas M.-12/13/2002
2621<<< The West itself provides the evidence that destroys Thomas M.-12/13/2002
2620Don't expect facts to impress the ideologues. TomThomas M.-12/13/2002
2619Don't pretend you hadn't seen this post: Message 18319526Thomas M.-12/13/2002
2618<i> Because the surrender offer was conditional.</i> It was cThomas M.-12/13/2002
2617My fault on the post-war study. Actually, it was a study conducted before the A-Thomas M.-12/13/2002
2616Yes, and we did everything we could to block the "peace offensive". TThomas M.-12/13/2002
2615I've said a couple of times that sometimes one has to choose the lesser evilBrumar89-12/13/2002
2614Atrocious yes. But that's the nature of war. Unacceptable, maybe that is TimF-12/13/2002
2613<i> Did you miss the part about "intentional bombing of civilian popuTimF-12/13/2002
2612You are defending a position impossible to defend - that it was OK to nuke civilzonder-12/13/2002
2611I notice phrases like "not justified by military necessity" and "Brumar89-12/13/2002
2610Bill - You cannot excuse an atrocious act of incinerating two cities of civilianzonder-12/13/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News