SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Gold & Gold Stock Analysis
An SI Board Since August 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
29622 477 0 GLD
Emcee:  Kirk © Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
26405Thanks,Jim. Re Gold: Have been thinking about the ever deeper involvement of IMFecrire-10/15/2011
26404WTGJim McMannis-10/15/2011
26403I especially enjoyed the last few replies! ;-)Bill/WA-10/15/2011
26402Gold COT shows large spec long position unchanged (no net new buying); commerciaecrire110/14/2011
26401ot/ sold my AMZN all time high 244 (40 point profit). Expect to rebuy on profitbecrire210/14/2011
26400As expected. both broad stocks and Gold looking good. Should make for a decent pecrire-10/14/2011
26399True. I wish there were a movement to promote just that. Can't think of a suecrire-10/13/2011
26398>>>Until then we have to trade within the existing system.<<< Tommaso710/13/2011
26397The reality is that gold is held in licensed storage and the vast majority ownerecrire-10/13/2011
26396Well, then, we have come full circle back to the beginning of banking, when goldTommaso-10/13/2011
26395I am thinking about gold that is purported to be held in your name in a vault. IGST510/13/2011
26394>>> gold is little more than another form of fiat currency<<< Tommaso-10/13/2011
26393The buying and selling of imaginary gold is the bulk of the 'gold market'GST910/13/2011
26392Interesting: In the 1960's, Anthony deAngelis obtained millions in loans, usecrire-10/13/2011
26391Seems like Mexico purchased 110 tons of gold that dosen't exist. seekingalppitbull_1_us410/13/2011
26390THANKS, GST! Open 2000 of these outlets. That is staggering in scope let alonIngotWeTrust-10/13/2011
26389When debating the price trend of any asset, it always pays to meet the buyer andGST110/13/2011
26388<b>Gold's financial role likely to expand - Lassonde</b> <i&bull_dozer210/12/2011
26387Gold up a bit thanks to weaker dollar and copper showing some life. Mining stockecrire110/12/2011
26386Well, it's higher than zero,so it's on a bearish trend.LOL.ecrire-10/11/2011
26385o/t the three year at .54% compares to last month at .29% -- that points towardsGST210/11/2011
26384ot/ Treasury auctions 32 billion 3 year notes at 0.54%. That's where the monecrire-10/11/2011
26383The PM sector is underperforming the oil and gas, and base metal sectors today, KevinKT-10/11/2011
26382[graphic] '<i>But Ole, ow cann oy yump, venn oy gott no place to stoomarcos-10/11/2011
26381The fragility of any gold rally is quite evident. Stocks stall, Dollar holds itsecrire210/11/2011
26380Nothing has changed in the last two years that would make gold a bad place to beTommaso310/10/2011
26379Nice to see a decent Gold rally. The impetus comes from the weaker dollar which,ecrire-10/10/2011
26378Guess you're right; $12 down doesn't count for much these days...$300 doecrire110/7/2011
26377One way of resolving the uncertainty of the price direction is to wait for the nGST1010/7/2011
26376Those threads who heed the warnings?Jim McMannis210/7/2011
26375This "lateral support" looks shaky. Struggled last three days with minecrire-10/7/2011
26374Jim, what thread makes you popular if you rub it in? <g>benwood-10/7/2011
26373Good post, thanks. That "lateral support" is important. A rally seems ecrire-10/6/2011
26372Heinz, probably the premier macro guy around: Message 27686273carranza2210/6/2011
26371Another one of your masterpieces.Your sorry mentor isopatch would be proud.ecrire310/6/2011
26370I used to post more on the yahoo stock boards but found them intellectually uselecrire410/6/2011
26369saying that people would rather not see their portfolio values decline is clearlNOW210/6/2011
26368Just a guess, but I think Jim is closer to the truth than you would like to admiSawdusty1010/6/2011
26367Gold has technical resistance at $1705. We'll see if it gets above that. I tLand Shark-10/6/2011
26366Kevinkt wrote that long term holders must be "disappointed".He is takeecrire210/6/2011
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News