SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MDRX: Allscripts, Inc.
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
716 7 0 MDRX
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
266A4 acquisition does seem to make MDRX a more attractive acquisition down the linckrunner2001-1/19/2006
265I Agree completely. I think that the A4 acquisition is a solid plus for MDRX butcupiditasradix-1/19/2006
264Looks like an 800 lb. gorilla will be showing up on QSII doorstep.ckrunner2001-1/19/2006
263Agreed. Clearly, management has to be willing and able to maximize value. Appahappyhawaiian-1/19/2006
262FWIW, you can often see companies trade at significant discounts to Intrinsic Vacupiditasradix-1/18/2006
261As per HLTH: The WebMD stake is presently worth $1.85 billion. A conservative happyhawaiian-1/18/2006
260Surprisingly, we haven't collapsed here (yet). At the JP Morgan conference happyhawaiian-1/18/2006
259All of these vendors have some form of web client. However, fat clients have tyckrunner2001-1/16/2006
258Ignorant question coming up: In trying to think five years ahead, why wouldnBoon-1/15/2006
257Late to the HCIT game, but increasingly interested in it. Have you ever thoughtBoon-1/15/2006
256I'm sticking w/ my original 18 month thought train.ckrunner2001-1/13/2006
255Interesting QuadraMed is mentioned. Any thoughts?ckrunner2001-1/13/2006
254Well, it sounds as if this guy is trying to sell MDRX a practice management systhappyhawaiian-1/13/2006
253Thanks for the article! It is indeed heavy stuff. But I'll offer a few thocupiditasradix-1/12/2006
252cupid: good to have you back on board. Nice post. Very optimistic. However, Jhappyhawaiian-1/12/2006
251Best wishes to all for 2006 - MDRX should do very well. I have not checked thiscupiditasradix-1/12/2006
250Hawaiian- finally your boy Weiland sees light, should see 5% uptick today. Wed 7prenup-1/11/2006
249From the Zixi PR department: Regarding fourth quarter e-prescribing recruiting ckrunner2001-1/10/2006
248Yes & It is Vermont.ckrunner2001-1/6/2006
247No question about it. It seems obvious GT doesnt aspire to be a GE suit, nor wilprenup-1/6/2006
246I think that another sticking point is the role that GT would like to play in thckrunner2001-1/6/2006
245GE was well aware of IDX's 17% interest in MDRX as well as its sales alliancprenup-1/5/2006
244I agree they would rather own MDRX, but the price may be or have been the stickihappyhawaiian-1/5/2006
243Nicely stated.ckrunner2001-1/5/2006
242How long do you think MDRX spent getting their software working with IDXC. You ckrunner2001-1/5/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News