SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
27311 121 0 VLNCQ
Emcee:  da_cheif™ Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
26636I think I'm beginning to see the nefarious plan behind all your posts - you&shadow nose-1/29/2006
26635Press Release Source: Valence Technology Inc. Valence Technology Announces RelJacques Tenzel-1/26/2006
26634Business Week Online JANUARY 5, 2006 Technology By Bradley Berman Pursuing NGreg Growth-1/26/2006
26633Nice move today, only $98 and change to your call. But what's $98 and 4 yeaMGV-1/24/2006
26632nope ...nuttin new here....same ol visnic pos......lololololda_cheif™-1/24/2006
26631"<b>Production is <i>anticipated</i> to begin</b> oMGV-1/24/2006
26630Valence Technology Announces Expansion of its Lithium-ion Battery Line Monday JGreg Growth-1/24/2006
26629You too bought lower than the current price. siliconinvestor.com Why should MGV-1/18/2006
26628I'm not a loser...I bought low and intending to sell high. You should act mosammy™ -_--1/18/2006
26627If it did, you would still be a 20% loser.MGV-1/18/2006
26626RE: "The readers' worst pick was Valence Technology (Nasdaq: VLNC - Newsammy™ -_--1/17/2006
26625VLNC in the news. biz.yahoo.com <i>"The readers' worst pick waMGV-1/17/2006
26624wolanchuk.comsammy™ -_--1/12/2006
26623You failed! You don't want to know what you proved.MGV-1/12/2006
26622Just to prove that the da_cheif is the best in the West! His record is actually sammy™ -_--1/12/2006
26621Right. And if he did, why would you put one pick on a stock thread of a companyMGV-1/12/2006
26620da_cheif recommended the stock on his site... I never babblesammy™ -_--1/12/2006
26619What are you babbling about on the VLNC thread? Nanoviricides Inc. Is this bliMGV-1/12/2006
26618Nanoviricides Inc - Hail to da_Cheif. LOL! stockcharts.comsammy™ -_--1/12/2006
26617<i>>>Take it private boys!</i> That is an excellent suggestioSI Dave-1/12/2006
26616Another poor call by the stock tout/"timer" To: P. Ramamoorthy who wrMGV-1/12/2006
26615Take it private boys!cmg-1/12/2006
26614Try again. Lets see how many times I get you to post before you answer. Keep pMGV-1/11/2006
26613Bingo. Cheers, JTJ.T.-1/11/2006
26612Mark G Visnic thinks he is judge and arbiter for VLNC. I want to know when he aJ.T.-1/11/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News