SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Gold & Gold Stock Analysis
An SI Board Since August 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
29622 477 0 GLD
Emcee:  Kirk © Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
26725Zero Hedge has been predicting world apocalypse for some time now; its their stoecrire411/16/2011
26724This Sweet Snippet from Gonzalo Lira (huh?) this AM: "....The “somebody” oshakes111/16/2011
26723Even the "pros" are getting caught trading paper gold: youtube.comkidl-11/16/2011
26722Gold: just being pushed and pulled around depending on the broad market action. ecrire-11/15/2011
26721You are right about GS of course. In GST's mind the name Goldman Sachs just ecrire111/15/2011
26720G&S going short gold ... ??? From Kitco - by Eric McWhinnie "On Mokidl111/15/2011
26719Here's what you are trying to have a conversation with <G>: youtube.cTommaso111/14/2011
26718I have read this and many variations of it for some time now. If one wears blindecrire111/14/2011
26717<if Gold could rally> I wonder what this means? Does it mean that after reGST1811/14/2011
26716Gold is a giant beachball -- no matter how many vested interests try to hold it GST711/14/2011
26715Gold: It would be a positive sign if Gold could rally in response to continued Iecrire111/14/2011
26714Very early in my savings and investment career I was betrayed by the United StatTommaso811/13/2011
26713<<Therein is the difference between gold and other investments. In Gold soSwampDogg311/13/2011
26712i hope your list of countries that wont nationalize doesnt include the US, as plNOW-11/13/2011
26711Of course 20% decline is serious, but again, the broad markets dropped almost thSawdusty111/13/2011
26710Would this be applicable? "Stocks / the markets are like women ... If we ckidl-11/13/2011
26709Ok "collapse" is not applicable. But a 20% decline is serious by any secrire-11/13/2011
26708Curious about Armstrong's argument on gold--any thoughts? "Then there CusterInvestor111/13/2011
26707You may be confusing me with others, I said nothing about buy and hold....was juSawdusty411/13/2011
26706If I may be so bold, one of your best posts.carranza2211/13/2011
26705I do not understand enough about banking to be able to guess how the problems inTommaso711/13/2011
26704>>> his disgusting character assassination scribbles. Even being drunk Tommaso311/13/2011
26703All these posts defending the Gold buy and hold method have merit, given the hisecrire811/13/2011
26702I probably did not chose my words well, because I am not complaining about volatSawdusty211/13/2011
26701" I have yet to find an instrument without volatility, especially these dayprometheus1976111/13/2011
26700All I know is , if I lost 11 straight hands to the dealer... I wouldn't be bDouglas M. Benedict111/13/2011
26699During the tech mania from 1994-2000 the Nasdaq had about 20 of those "collSwampDogg1411/13/2011
26698You sound just like someone who has missed the boat the last ten years in Gold sgolfer72211/13/2011
26697Well that's just great. The last 10 years worked for you; maybe so will the ecrire-11/12/2011
26696What a dumb, stupid harangue! I guess its Saturday and you're in your cups aecrire-11/12/2011
26695>>>I will never join the fanatics and could care less where Gold is in Tommaso911/12/2011
26694"A few months ago GDX was over 66. It then plummeted to 51. I don't wanSawdusty411/12/2011
26693This fanatic has avg cost of $311/oz (including transportation costs) having bouPaxb2u911/12/2011
26692"...I will never join the fanatics..." Excellent. One of my canariesbenwood411/12/2011
26691The strength of my argument is that over the past five years (actually several mbenwood1011/12/2011
26690The weakness in your argument is neither you nor I nor anyone else knows where Gecrire211/12/2011
26689The reality is that those who are inflexible with their PM holdings are extremelbenwood711/12/2011
26688>> Especially since few people inside the IRS understand them. << YMario :-)-11/11/2011
26687Those partnership things are ridiculous. They even want you to report them in IRTommaso-11/11/2011
26686We don't have a State tax return here in Florida, but my accountant is not mGROUND ZERO™-11/11/2011
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News