SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1894 6 0
Emcee:  Iceberg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
269 To All: Please make note of this interesting post, and the link... exchange20Iceberg-4/30/1997
268 Ice, I also prefer the humorous approach to dealing with type I posts. And mayStan Walker-4/28/1997
267 Greg, Thanks for chiming in, we are all always glad to hear other's opinionStan Walker-4/28/1997
266 As I said, there are more succient versions (around 16KB total file size, or abindexer-4/28/1997
265 <<I did look at the link Greg provided, and suspect that few, if any peopBill Ulrich-4/28/1997
264 >I suggest we discuss the lack of distinction pointed out by Greg. GottfrieIceberg-4/28/1997
263 Ice, even if we're reinventing - I doubt that most SI contributors know aboGottfried-4/28/1997
262 >could you provide a source, or reference, for the "established Netiqueindexer-4/27/1997
261 >I just happened across your thread, and would like to chime in with a few uIceberg-4/27/1997
260 >Ice, I see two options. >#1. we post a message to the receiver... >Iceberg-4/27/1997
259 With all due respect, I just happened across your thread, and would like to chiindexer-4/27/1997
258 Ice, I see two options. #1. When we see a type I post we post a message to thStan Walker-4/27/1997
257 >When are we going to start promoting our Post Type and Response Protocols tIceberg-4/27/1997
256 Ice, Some people are just not going to tell us where they get their info. I asStan Walker-4/27/1997
255 >We have a level-headed, compassionate group here. Gottfried, I must saIceberg-4/27/1997
254 Gottfried / dealing with market losses Gottfried, Thank you for the link.Iceberg-4/27/1997
253 ICE, non-kook: for an alternate way to deal with market loss see... techstocksGottfried-4/27/1997
252 Bill, I failed to open your post earlier. Please lets not involve a professionaGottfried-4/27/1997
251 ICE, you're right about the can of worms. Let's drop this quickly and Gottfried-4/27/1997
250 ICE, if there is agreement to take certain actions, then that should show up inGottfried-4/27/1997
249 <<...do you think the existing type II response protocol is sufficient foBill Ulrich-4/26/1997
248 >The present protocol then, for the "standard" Type II is sufficieIceberg-4/26/1997
247 From Gottfried: <There is always the possibility of a person with bi-polar iBill Ulrich-4/26/1997
246 >another possibility to look out for... >There is always the possibilityIceberg-4/26/1997
245 >Other thread members may interprete silence as agreement. >some responsIceberg-4/26/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):