SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Kopin Corp. (KOPN)
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1820 64 0 KOPN
Emcee:  LLLefty Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
270 Footlambert = 3.426 cd/m^2; Lumen is a different critter, referring to total ouJim Armstrong-11/21/1997
269 Tom, from my reading of the Kopin WWW pages, you were as fast and loose with thToby-11/21/1997
268 On the Kopin Web site for Cyberdispaly Technical Specs they say the cyberdisplakech-11/21/1997
267 Sorry Toby - I only have a verbal source. When I get the time I'll try to lkech-11/21/1997
266 When has Kopin made this claim? I'm not personally so interested as to runToby-11/21/1997
265 Toby - So you would expect the TFS product to be a more efficient user of powerkech-11/21/1997
264 Tom, I would guess that the TFS display uses less power than the KOPN because iToby-11/21/1997
263 Tom, The pixel resolution of the TFS/NSM product is higher than the pixel resobenjaminf-11/20/1997
262 Anybody know any reason why the TFS/NSM product would use more power than the Kkech-11/20/1997
261 Ben - You almost had me buying TFS there for a minute... Actually I do own a bikech-11/20/1997
260 Can't speak for 'em. Dunno. But then TFS is not an end-product supplierJim Armstrong-11/19/1997
259 Toby, You are right. I described the performance of polysilicon, not single cbenjaminf-11/19/1997
258 Jim- Interesting article. Why didn't they mention the TFS projection systekech-11/19/1997
257 Ben, I didn't follow your argument about charge mobility in the Kopin vs. TToby-11/18/1997
256techweb.com reads in part: ". . . One other potential contender may be luJim Armstrong-11/18/1997
255 Ben - Thanks for explaining the problems in the Kopin process. Suppose we akech-11/18/1997
254 Tom, No matter what product Kopin ships, they will never get past the "rebenjaminf-11/18/1997
253 Thanks Noblesse Oblige- Just a note on Kopin's shipment plans. They plan tkech-11/18/1997
252 Hi Tom, There are not, as yet, any "contracts" for use of the NSM/TFNoblesse Oblige-11/17/1997
251 Benjamin- There is of course another interpretation which is that they don'kech-11/17/1997
250 Jim, Excellent observations of the difference between the business practices obenjaminf-11/17/1997
249 Thanks Jim- interesting observations about personalities of companies (tand thekech-11/16/1997
248 They're evidently shooting at insertion in different markets of interest - Jim Armstrong-11/15/1997
247 I don't think it's about the Kopin product. I think it's about the Jim Armstrong-11/15/1997
246 Toby - Note that Maher at Advest was an early analyst at Tucker Anthony who inikech-11/15/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):