SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Computer Associates
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5232 59 0 CA
Emcee:  Everard Taylor Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2707 I feel better now. Coverage of CA was initiated by Chatfield Dean with a STRONBostonView-7/23/1998
2706 David: Re: "How about <b>preceded</b> by the usual profit takiTEDennis-7/23/1998
2705 My short answer is yes. Unfortunately I had to chase the stock this AM and bouMike 2.0-7/23/1998
2704 All you have to do is look at CA's chart for the last 5 yrs. Yes CA has itbattle beast-7/23/1998
2703 DH CA earnings were actually pretty good. But they put the "kibosh"THE DUGGER-7/23/1998
2702 Morgan Stanely just upgraded CA. said it was an over reation. frank F Perry-7/23/1998
2701 Here is an interesting read on CA accounting practices. fabmktbabe.com JK janet kuhnert-7/23/1998
2700 Joseph: Among all the downgrades yesterday there were a few analysts who recorupert1-7/23/1998
2699 I am new to this thread. (and I now very little about CA too ) it looks to me Joseph Pareti-7/23/1998
2698 Agree, Deer Hunter...someone at Reuters was pretty damn lazy. Sure, they couldMike 2.0-7/22/1998
2697 Paul, CA will bounce a few points so for those willing to take a trade it is wHaim R. Branisteanu-7/22/1998
2696 Haim, Glad to see you back on the site. Thought we had lost you with all of yoPaul V.-7/22/1998
2695 Look at the crap this reporter put out.......they call it disappointing earningDEER HUNTER-7/22/1998
2694 You may want to look into some undervalued y2k companies. My favorites are PTUSRobert Gomez-7/22/1998
2693 Apology? hardly. your vitriolic emotional ramblings have done nothing to serBox-By-The-Riviera™-7/22/1998
2692 all joking aside........... I feel your pain....and I'm sorry you have it. Box-By-The-Riviera™-7/22/1998
2691 I think the s**t hasn't hit the fan yet on the receivable issue. Long term Resry-7/22/1998
2690 That's a good idea Mike. Selling covered calls...I'm gonna look into itDEER HUNTER-7/22/1998
2689 Gall Your statement <To be serious TA was telling it would go down, since Mike Gordon-7/22/1998
2688 Bubble gum company huh? You are so full of shit. (eom) DH DEER HUNTER-7/22/1998
2687 Don't invest in Bubble Company and you will not have a headache. To be serGall-7/22/1998
2686 Joel, I hope you are OK. Some times I am early but hey, with WS is difficult toHaim R. Branisteanu-7/22/1998
2685 Joel......it's pretty rare to see any stock let alone CA make both a 52 weeDEER HUNTER-7/22/1998
2684 it's a thought no one has put much faith in.... until now maybe.... Box-By-The-Riviera™-7/22/1998
2683 Can someone provide conference call number and code? Thanks in advance. Uncertain Walker-7/22/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News