SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
272 Bad institutional jackasses?David S.-2/8/1997
271 No, they're not playing golf, they're playing badmiton. (Just kidding, David S.-2/8/1997
270 Hi Byron, I actually like the thinly traded stock, because of the greatest rewaWade-2/8/1997
269 Hello John, I do not know if mm is playing this stock. But, I stick to my princWade-2/8/1997
268 Byron,as a recent purchaser of this little gem in the 6's congratulations oTimothy Tashjian-2/7/1997
267 Hi Byron, You must have spend a lot of time to study this comapny. Excellent! Wade-2/7/1997
266 David: Some comments on your recent posts: 1. You don't give NANO's reByron Angel-2/7/1997
265 Hi David, You wrote: >PS - Their pre-announcement of the Dec. numbers seemeWade-2/6/1997
264 Dave, I dont disagree with some of your points but I dont inderstand the correlTimothy Tashjian-2/6/1997
263 Hi David, Thank you for your input. Your concern is very valid. However, I was Wade-2/6/1997
262 Sure, if earnings grow at a nice rate for ?quarters, at some point, the relativDavid S.-2/6/1997
261 David thanks for the inside story from an analyst's viewpoint. One thing yoAndrew G.-2/6/1997
260 I'm an analyst with one of those "institutions" that you (plural)David S.-2/6/1997
259 They manipulate medium size companies also, check the chart for s3 at earnings Winegrower-2/5/1997
258 John,tell me it aint so. It seems to me more than ever before the MM's and Timothy Tashjian-2/5/1997
257 Andrew, The market was off today, especially in the techs. NANO has had a goodByron Angel-2/5/1997
256 I've seen the same thing over the past few years and I agree John so if theMichael C Ellenberger-2/5/1997
255 I've been in and out of nano, good company but manipulated stock. Runs up Winegrower-2/5/1997
254 Andrew,it was down to 6 1/2 at the open on a trade of 200 shares. Seems to me tTimothy Tashjian-2/5/1997
253 NANO took a light hit today. I can't understand why it's down at all inAndrew G.-2/5/1997
252 Lawrence, Your point is very well taken. Looking at the quarterly revenues andByron Angel-2/5/1997
251 Hi Board, I wrote an earlier reply note to you during my 30 min. lunch break inWade-2/4/1997
250 Hello Dan, Please elucidate "Their margins are going down not up. There # Wade-2/4/1997
249 Board, The owner would much rather sell the company than try to dump his stockDan McNeese-2/4/1997
248 Hi, Is this a major reason to own this stock? I thouhgt the fundamnetal should Wade-2/4/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News