SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GateField (GATE)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4005 15 0 GATE
Emcee:  Chi Jones Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2730 I hope so!R Petersen-4/13/1998
2729 Now 9:30am PDT. Most of the fear selling over. Volume down considerably sincelml-4/13/1998
2728 Slob, I am sorry it was not negative income, it was negative cost of goods soldZeev Hed-4/13/1998
2727 Zeev & lml, Re: Negative Service income. My read on this item is that GAslob-4/13/1998
2726 "Rohm and Gatefield Expand Technology and Marketing Relationship" faTom Shutters-4/13/1998
2725 R. It is breaking down as we speak. It will be interesting to see at what pointZeev Hed-4/13/1998
2724 We are extremely volatile this a.m. Up and down like bad shocks on an old car. R Petersen-4/13/1998
2723 Zeev, it is great to have you posting on the GATE thread again. I also appreciaTom Shutters-4/13/1998
2722 lml, right now, my very generous estimate is that Gate will need at least $10 MZeev Hed-4/13/1998
2721 Zeev, Thanks for your response. However, I would like to respond & inquirlml-4/13/1998
2720 Zeev and lml: Awesome and well thought-out posts. Thanks. KellyW-4/12/1998
2719 Kelly and the rest, instead of answering to each of you here are some thoughts Zeev Hed-4/12/1998
2718 Dr. Zeev: I, myself, am trying to assess the damage of Q4 numbers, & the ilml-4/12/1998
2717 Dear Kelly: After what they have been through maybe they DESERVE a little CheeJDN-4/12/1998
2716 Zeev: Thought that would be your opinion of the financials at this point. ThereHARVEY G. KOEDYKER-4/12/1998
2715 Here's the ROHM news, digested for you: EE TIMES, April 13, 1998: Rohm LiKellyW-4/12/1998
2714 design wins don't concern me as they are developing sales alliances with I2jm-4/12/1998
2713 Zeev, I'm in agreement with you in regards to earnings. I never thought orKellyW-4/12/1998
2712 stock talk, your question is very good, and I disagree with Kelly on this. I thZeev Hed-4/12/1998
2711 stock talk Kelly is referring the good news from this link techweb.com dougDouglas Raushel-4/12/1998
2710 Harvey, to me the results of the quarters do not seem at all as a clean up. Au Zeev Hed-4/12/1998
2709 Doug: reguarding technicals at this point. Technicals at this point really donHARVEY G. KOEDYKER-4/11/1998
2708 <"The ROHM news is good,"> From the earnings press release &stock talk-4/11/1998
2707 agree that two fabs are now in place-believe the .25 tech will be a reality soojm-4/11/1998
2706 jm It seems to me the seeds are being planted by Gatefield. They now have twoDouglas Raushel-4/11/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News