SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
An SI Board Since July 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
275872 364 1 AMD
Emcee:  Elmer Phud Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
273947I've been doing that for years.Yes, I've been watching you make bogus, sfastpathguru5/19/2015
273946The inspiration may have been the Dell case, it's been so many years ago thafastpathguru5/19/2015
273945fpg Oooh Elmer, you really got me there! I've been doing that for years. Elmer Phud5/19/2015
273944fpg You're just running from your own words like a coward. Your originationElmer Phud5/19/2015
273943And repeatedly you've simply said $6B then argued about 2006. When you find fastpathguru5/19/2015
273942So when you say Parts Is Parts you aren't making a statement about my "fastpathguru5/19/2015
273941fpg I've posted REPEATEDLY that the payments TOTALLING $6B were peaking in Elmer Phud5/19/2015
273940fpg "I could easily explain how the $6B was unrelated to AMD's failureElmer Phud5/19/2015
273939yes, for several decades you have been warning everyone who would listen. I'fastpathguru5/19/2015
273938For years, we have been imparting wisdom to you on the semiconductor industry ..rzborusa5/19/2015
273937BTW, you haven't been honest when reporting this number. The payments made ifastpathguru5/19/2015
273936When you say "Parts Is Parts", it is a criticism of my position re: thfastpathguru5/19/2015
273935you contend that Intel's $6B payments to DELL were unrelated to AMD's fafastpathguru5/19/2015
273934fpg The time period of the huge payments to DELL is 2006 BTW, you haven't Elmer Phud5/19/2015
273933fpg When you say "Parts Is Parts", it is a criticism of my position rElmer Phud5/19/2015
273932fpg you contend that Intel's $6B payments to DELL were unrelated to AMD'Elmer Phud5/19/2015
273931No you imagined I did. You brought it up.Sorry, wrong. When you say "Parts fastpathguru5/19/2015
273930They're supposed to be stupid questions. Just like your $6B question. Inconsfastpathguru5/19/2015
273929Ask Elmer, he brought it up. No you imagined I did. You brought it up.Elmer Phud5/19/2015
273928So AMD has been stepping on its own d*ck for the past 6 years ... Why are you &qfastpathguru5/19/2015
273927fpg many of my answers ("Why isn't X in jail?") require no documeElmer Phud5/19/2015
273926You provided virtually no documentation whatsoever. You presented your conclusiofastpathguru5/19/2015
273925Mr Guru, Re: "AMD has been under-utilizing every single resource they haveMahmoud Mohammed5/19/2015
273924fpg Then I'll just await your guidance as to what you need clarification onElmer Phud5/18/2015
273923You have not answered to my satisfaction. I set the standards here as to when afastpathguru5/18/2015
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News