SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
IMDS nasdaq bulletin board
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4122 23 0 IMDS
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2747 Wilson wrote: <i>will someone answer my question - if the technology is Andrew Abraham-3/24/1999
2746 bug this kenita-3/24/1999
2745 Walter Wilson wrote: <i>I am sorry I have not read all of your posts. &lAndrew Abraham-3/24/1999
2744 In the immortal words of Bono (of U2 fame) Am I buggin you? I mean to bug you.gao seng-3/24/1999
2743 I know how he feels sheesh Stand on Mammograms Greeted by Outrage By GINA KOgao seng-3/24/1999
2742 The studies show that somewhere between zero to 10 women out of 10,000 in theirgao seng-3/24/1999
2741 Until CTLM hits the market, do you mind if we keep getting mammograms and ultrakenita-3/24/1999
2740 It is a valid point that I as an interested investor would consider. The wholgao seng-3/24/1999
2739 i was just presenting IMDS's own views on the situation -- showing you how Labrador-3/24/1999
2738 haha parrots dont think so which is it? lab, that was a cut & paste from ygao seng-3/24/1999
2737 Do you think the stock could have declined because investors are more savvy nowkenita-3/24/1999
2736 Walter, I believe that that is the Company's statement not IMDS. But why hLabrador-3/24/1999
2735 My guess is you all work for Westinghouse gao seng-3/24/1999
2734 Sir: the plain truth is that Nasdaq listed stocks receive preferential treatmegao seng-3/24/1999
2733 I don't think you read anyones posts. You are a parrotkenita-3/24/1999
2732 I am sorry I have not read all of your posts. But until you answer me as to whgao seng-3/24/1999
2731 Walter Wilson wrote: >consultants have to consult for someone, presumably fAndrew Abraham-3/24/1999
2730 >>>The reason the comapny didn't get listing (guess here) is theyjwk-3/24/1999
2729 EWEB on briefing.com as predicted - BOWG steady UT consultants have to consultgao seng-3/24/1999
2728 Walter Wilson wrote: >Could you post that for me please? Or would your emplAndrew Abraham-3/24/1999
2727 Could you post that for me please? Or would your employer object. BUY EWEBgao seng-3/24/1999
2726 Hey Walter, don't forget to post the US News & World Report article froAndrew Abraham-3/24/1999
2725 from the nytimes last summer: nytimes.com Checkups: Mammogram Alternatives; gao seng-3/24/1999
2724 Lab wrote: <i>Hi Walter, I think that it was misleading to not discloseAndrew Abraham-3/24/1999
2723 the issue that is being raised is the lack of disclosure of a material event. Labrador-3/24/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News