SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Tonto and Janice Teach Investing
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
302 21 0
Emcee:  Ellen Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
277 Well, you didn't answer mine... > <i>That's why I sent you heEllen-5/2/1999
276 Please answer the questions: Did you not create the thread? Did you not name itRazorbak-5/2/1999
275 Guess you didn't see my edit. Are you the current "go after Ellen&quoEllen-5/2/1999
274 Did you not create the thread? Did you not name it "Tonto and Janice TeachRazorbak-5/2/1999
273 I see your group has conducted twisting lessons. How many were in the class? OEllen-5/2/1999
272 <<when did it change on SI that it's the thread originator's threRazorbak-5/2/1999
271 So, when did it change on SI that it's the thread originator's thread, Ellen-5/2/1999
270 <<look at the header>> It says, "Tonto and Janice Teach InvesRazorbak-5/2/1999
269 Cute. And, um, whose thread is it? (hint: look at the header) <i>Maybe&Ellen-5/2/1999
268 Well, it is her thread. Maybe's she's just trying to teach you investinRazorbak-5/2/1999
267 <i>I guess it's because we find you really annoying.</i> How cEllen-5/2/1999
266 <i>Why is that Janice?</i> I guess it's because we find you reJanice Shell-5/2/1999
265 <i>I thought about yelling "Cat fight!", but I figured that wouEllen-5/2/1999
264 I thought about yelling "Cat fight!", but I figured that wouldn'tRazorbak-5/2/1999
263 <i>ROFL! Now we're down to underwear jokes, is that it?</i> LoEllen-5/2/1999
262 <i>If consistently flamed, we retaliate. What is it about this that you fEllen-5/2/1999
261 ROFL! Now we're down to underwear jokes, is that it? Well, at least the thrRazorbak-5/2/1999
260 Not as tight as yours seem to be. I've been meaning to ask you anyway...whEllen-5/2/1999
259 <i>I know this will probably sound flippant but I don't purposely meaEllen-5/2/1999
258 <i>This is just the same ole, same ole... What everybody else does is &quJanice Shell-5/2/1999
257 The issue is as I said it was. Period. And thank you for re-posting it. And whEllen-5/2/1999
256 >>>>"Man Found Guilty Of Net Harassment"<<<<zonkie-5/2/1999
255 WOW!! You really DO have your panties in a knot, don't you? Kick back, havJanice Shell-5/2/1999
254 <i>Geez. The issue is as I've always said. It is NOT about negatJanice Shell-5/2/1999
253 <i>Ellen, I have never seen a case where Janice and her friends weren'Janice Shell-5/2/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News