Have you read your constitution today? | Political Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
Have you read your constitution today?

An SI Board Since June 2002

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
403	15	1

Emcee: epicure	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Posted
278	X, I concur with your recent decision on the disrupter. He's offered nothin	Raymond Duray	7/8/2003
277	I always appreciate your posts here TM. I'm sorry to have banned the person	epicure	7/7/2003
276	No name calling I don't care if this thread is dead, I don't want name c	epicure	7/7/2003
275	Nice. You can twist Americans fighting to end slavery as something bad. What a	Brumar89	7/7/2003
274	That was the reason that the U.S. ended slavery with a bloodbath, instead of end	Thomas M.	7/7/2003
273	You forgot to accuse Lincoln of depriving Southerners of their lawful property v	Brumar89	7/6/2003
272	Lincoln's acts during his reign as "dictator": - suspended the wr	Thomas M.	7/6/2003
271	what a horrible idea	epicure	6/13/2003
270	<b>An Appointed Congress? </b> by	Thomas M.	6/12/2003
269	And it is quite obvious that Churchill was correct.	epicure	6/3/2003
268	re: the destruction of our civil liberties <<< President Bush is supp	Thomas M.	6/3/2003
267	Excellent article: "Because the grand jury can easily function as a stalki	epicure	5/22/2003
266	<b>A Grand Façade: How the Grand Jury Was C	Thomas M.	5/22/2003
265	Hardly. Everyone knows this country was founded on judeo-christian values regard	Bill	5/21/2003
264	The Declaration of Independence is not a legal document. It is essentially a po	Thomas M.	5/21/2003
263	<i> Nobody said there was. </i> You are correct. I re-read y	Thomas M.	5/21/2003
262	Nobody said there was. Of course, some like you refuse to even acknowledge those	Bill	5/21/2003
261	There is no "endowed creator" language in our Constitution. Our Const	Thomas M.	5/20/2003
260	<i>"Unique among the nations, America recognized the source of our ch	LPS5	5/20/2003
259	Ashcroft is a disaster. Nevertheless, his rhetoric sounds awfully like the end	Bill	5/20/2003
258	Another speech by Ashcroft, with another full frontal assault on democracy and C	Thomas M.	5/20/2003
257	Thanks. That's ugly, isn't it? Tom	Thomas M.	5/20/2003
256	Not "recently" and not limited to "U.S." freedoms. usdoj.go	Bill	5/20/2003
255	U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft recently declared that U.S. freedoms are &qu	Thomas M.	5/20/2003
254	<b>From Lawyer to Test Case</b>	Thomas M.	5/3/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):