SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went!
An SI Board Since February 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
28311 135 0 INSP
Emcee:  White Shoes Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
27911JAIN'S INSP TRADING KICKED BUTT! SHOULD START A HEDGE FUND!SpongeBrain-8/27/2003
27910Nope, you heard wrong, Sr K. There was no angry tone used. Just facts. Go bacKLP-8/27/2003
27909<<Bob said nothing of the sort>>? It is the angry, unproductive tonSr K-8/26/2003
27908Hi Charles..here's some old links on this and the original INSP board... YoKLP-8/26/2003
27907Bob said nothing of the sort... This is the original GNET board.... <i>AKLP-8/26/2003
27906Take a look at the list I am posting to CB Jr,,,,You will see the GNET original KLP-8/26/2003
27905Obviously a press release from Jain's lawyers or likely Jain himself, but noThe O-8/26/2003
27904To all: The Motley Fool take: <i>InfoSpace Rattles Jains</i> quicCharles W. Breaux, Jr.-8/26/2003
27903NJ did the opposite. Keeping it in and trading from the trust would have been thSr K-8/26/2003
27902Diogenes certainly wouldn't be looking at Merrill Lynch if he were looking fsandintoes-8/26/2003
27901Obviously he has no defense, judges don't just issue 250 million dollar summKeepItSimple-8/26/2003
27900Why? This is the infospace forum is it not? Are we not allowed to discuss INSP KeepItSimple-8/26/2003
27899You can buy and then sell, or sell and then buy, and the swing profit law applieSr K-8/26/2003
27898He has no scruples, and never has, so was it our fault for not selling when he bsandintoes-8/25/2003
27897Typical Jain speak. Read what he wrote, and you'll see exactly what he did.KeepItSimple-8/25/2003
27896KIS, I'll vouch.. You called it. Repeatedly. Years Ago... This guy was ySpongeBrain-8/25/2003
27895here is the law: law.uc.edu likely still would be an insider trade..... 16(b) wThe O-8/25/2003
27894What I don't get about this suit is the implication that it only became illelevy-8/25/2003
27893The news is finally picked up by cbsmarketwatch. You're right about KeepItsandintoes-8/25/2003
27892You might be confusing this thread with the original INSP thread. This was the SI Bob-8/24/2003
27891Look, as I said it years ago, the only rason Infospace bought GNET was because GKeepItSimple-8/24/2003
27890Hi Roger ~~ A Question and an appeal...<b>>>>>The case cenKLP-8/23/2003
27889<b>Jain Again Hits Seattle Times Front Page Today</b> His photo doeRoger Sherman-8/23/2003
27888Dang! I'd like to see the guy poor, jailed, then deported.Carolyn-8/23/2003
27887The case is a joke because securities transactions and law treat closing sales aSr K-8/23/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News