SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?*
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
30916 91 0 IDTC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
27966I'd say 5-10%, but then again what's fair market value of IDT? Its a hoScott Mc-10/7/2002
27965Jules, no I was more saying it has been in their economic interest to keep the pHawaii60-10/7/2002
27964H, So you're saying, IDT will have to pay a "penalty" if IDTB fallJules B. Garfunkel-10/7/2002
27963Scott, you may also wish to consider this in addition to any employee guaranteesHawaii60-10/5/2002
27962Scott, I've never liked the B's as you know. Although I admit some moneyHawaii60-10/5/2002
27961On topic (hey how come, you're not supposed to post on topic on this thread Scott Mc-10/4/2002
27960LOL, I think I was 25% of the civil postings, including some that support your hSteve Fancy-10/4/2002
27959Steve, knock off your BS. You're a friggin nut. I swearr like a little baby Hawaii60-10/4/2002
27958This guy files to sell 150 shares in the two's Smear. What the heck? biz.ySteve Fancy-10/4/2002
27957Hey Uncle Jules, You neglected to mention rampant hype, speculation, and outriSteve Fancy-10/4/2002
27956NTOP has been bidding 2 cents higher than the close since 4:00. Very unusual...Steve Fancy-10/3/2002
27955Hawaii, You are much better at stating facts and well reasoned analysis, than yoJules B. Garfunkel-10/3/2002
27954IDT Long Distance Gets Highest Rating in Wall Street Journal Ranking of Long DisSteve Fancy-10/3/2002
27953No doubt that's true. Certainly all involved in ntop that took it for a longHawaii60-10/3/2002
27952Smear, As I thought about what Sarah had to say, it wouldn't have left mSteve Fancy-10/3/2002
27951Everything OK there 613? SteveSteve Fancy-10/3/2002
27950<i>I'm guessing the stock will begin doing well...</i> If I hadTorus-10/3/2002
27949OK, in line with my post yesterday, ntop has now released their earnings date ofHawaii60-10/3/2002
27948Good. Let that be a lesson to everybody.613-10/3/2002
27947Ok - I'll consider not on-track posting anymore.613-10/3/2002
27946Well, see that it doesn't happen again!613-10/3/2002
27945Who me? Just trying to break up the monotony.613-10/3/2002
27944What's with the on-track post? Cut that out! Can't you see that this b613-10/3/2002
27943IDT gets a good mention in WSJ today. Snippet: In our survey, the better option613-10/3/2002
27942>>>Steve, hate to say it but you are posting like someone short the stoSteveJerseyShore-10/2/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News