SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Merck
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1580 80 0 MRK
Emcee:  Alfred W. Post Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
280 Yaacov: I don't think there is any news currently about MRK splitting. ThRandall H. Kikukawa-7/1/1997
279 Last time mrk split it was 3 for 1 @ $150. I think that's the level everyoDAVID BROWN-6/29/1997
278 To ALL. I have several questions rearding Merck and I appreciate your Yaacov-6/29/1997
277 Sonki: <When does window dressing end> Date I've seen is 3 business dJim Garrison-6/25/1997
276 Loos like LLY has near term questions. Some one came up w. better version of prSonki-6/25/1997
275 Sonki: <they just don't want to NOT have drugs in their portfolios> TJim Garrison-6/25/1997
274 No body gives a ---- to valuations, they just don't want to NOT have drugs Sonki-6/24/1997
273 Geoff Thanks for your insights. The market seems to be expecting a much higheseminole-6/24/1997
272 richard, You and I probably bought MRK about the same time. I had three reasonsGeoffrey Porter-6/24/1997
271 Geoff Good answer, I agree. I sold because my reason for buying (the panic ovseminole-6/24/1997
270 I am trying determine what I did wrong when I sold this stock at $75. richard,Geoffrey Porter-6/24/1997
269 Sonki: <Morgan Stanly ( i think) moved target from 105 to 120 today.> FrJim Garrison-6/24/1997
268techstocks.com target prices for various drug stocks....Sonki-6/23/1997
267 Sonki Its seems to me that if everything is overvalued, I should only be selliseminole-6/23/1997
266 "I am trying determine what I did wrong when I sold this stock at $75.&dper-6/23/1997
265 I just invested in mrk, pfe etc. last week. Everything is overvalued. look at cSonki-6/23/1997
264 Sonki What am I missing here on Merck. Merck is a great company that I did weseminole-6/23/1997
263 Morgan Stanly ( i think) moved target from 105 to 120 today.Sonki-6/23/1997
262 Dear Jim: As always, thanks for the thoughtful and intuitive analysis of MRK. Kevin A. Lynch-6/23/1997
261 Merck had a lot of selling pressure late in the day, but most significantly wasAndrew Findling-6/22/1997
260 Sonki: I'm not sure I understand how a numbers freak can like merck at 30 xJim Garrison-6/22/1997
259 Jim, I am a numbers freak! so I like your post, but all numbers aside, Mrk wilSonki-6/21/1997
258 Kman: Current SSG numbers I have on Merck are: Current price: 100 5 year estimaJim Garrison-6/21/1997
257 Jim, Look like Mrk. held 100 today, by just a hair. What do you see as the futKevin A. Lynch-6/20/1997
256 For those who cares or trades bond futures, I started a thread "Treasury BPatsy Collins-6/20/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):