SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
General Lithography
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1305 39 0
Emcee:  Andrew Vance Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
280 Cary and Andrew, Thanks very much for your thoughts!!!! You guys are the besTeri Skogerboe-4/24/1997
279 While I have not gotten into it in a big way, it is on my list of 7-10 stocks tAndrew Vance-4/24/1997
278 Teri, I looked at the GSNX earnings report, mostly the balance sheet. It doesCary Salsberg-4/24/1997
277 Hi Andrew, This morning last I checked GSNX was 8-1/8 thru 8-5/8? Sounds liTeri Skogerboe-4/24/1997
276 Was planning on worrying JUST about Cirrus this morning. Guess I'll have towm sharp-4/24/1997
275 See UTEK Thread. President of UTEK resigned. AndrewAndrew Vance-4/23/1997
274 You have excellent reading skills William. It is just unfortunate that the instAndrew Vance-4/23/1997
273 Re SVGI, buyers seemed to step in soundly at 17-18 following earnings. They canwm sharp-4/23/1997
272 I like FSII here at 11 but it is in a beauty contest with other equally attractAndrew Vance-4/23/1997
271 They have to be. They lumped all the junk into this quarter, it seems, and thenAndrew Vance-4/23/1997
270 Its a good thing my kids let me play with their NERF bat. I would hope the markAndrew Vance-4/23/1997
269 (Worried about CRUS though. What is your take on the restructuring? Are they inwm sharp-4/23/1997
268 Andrew, I noticed in the preview here you liked FSII under 14. Any current thouspiny norman-4/23/1997
267 I like what WFR had to say about the industry this evening (and they appear to wm sharp-4/23/1997
266 You are indeed correct Ian. Off the top of my head, the following is a brief liAndrew Vance-4/23/1997
265 Mike, I asked Andrew V a similar series of questions earlier on this threIan@SI-4/23/1997
264 Ian Thanks for the reply re 64Mb production. I have only a sketchy understmike iles-4/23/1997
263 Robert, Andrew: Here's a very interesting link I dug up. What do you guysRitz-4/23/1997
262 A press release I came across today: <i>Nikon will increase its output oFJB-4/22/1997
261 This is what I know, it ain't much... In the Solid-State Tech. '97 ResRitz-4/21/1997
260 I have been busy with other things recently and have not really checked into thAndrew Vance-4/21/1997
259 Warning: virgin post. I'm heavily long SVGI (@ about 22) and am trying to Ritz-4/21/1997
258 Mike, I haven't kept the stats re 64Mb production. However, it seems Ian@SI-4/20/1997
257 Andrew, No apologies required. That's exactly the sort of info I was lookinmike iles-4/20/1997
256 Thanks for adding that Ian. You are 100% correct. It is a jig saw puzzle that wAndrew Vance-4/19/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):