SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
ARP - V Argentina Gold
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3282 13 0 ARP
Emcee:  Steve Wright Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2807 Barrick moves on to Africa,going to acquire Sutton Resources in an all stock trSteven Lolas-2/18/1999
2806 Barrick buys Sutton at a PREMIUM versus the REDUCED offer for Argentina; newswSyncrude-2/18/1999
2805 DD, they have ways of buying and not showing through coporations and offshore aBill Jackson-2/18/1999
2804 Bill - you maybe right about about the control group - but not much volume realEnigma-2/18/1999
2803 Serge, ARP will go back above $5 in a heartbeat if another attempt is made. WhaBill Jackson-2/18/1999
2802 Thanks ray,just got update from company.Reason for selling last couple of days John BOYCE-2/18/1999
2801 The whole placement was taken down by Adolf Lundin. Why is a company that is iSudhir Khanna-2/18/1999
2800 Good point dd . Keep in mind Barrick does not like interference in projects, esJAS-2/18/1999
2799 JAS - I'm wondering if this will play out in a different way? Let's saEnigma-2/18/1999
2798 Claude, yes it may be the result of Barrick dropping the bid but also gold haviJAS-2/18/1999
2797JAS-2/18/1999
2796 <<In hindsight,everybody who didn't sell at $5+ is a loser.>> Claude Cormier-2/17/1999
2795 <<Approximately 8 mil oz of gold equivilant @ 50.00 net (a reasonable priClaude Cormier-2/17/1999
2794 I don't think Barrick will renew their offer, why would they. This company Serge Collins-2/17/1999
2793 I dont know, if you can convince someone down at ARP office, to tell you "robert azana-2/17/1999
2792 John some time ago I posted some things about what to expect if the Barrick bidMr. Oil-2/17/1999
2791 I believe this deposit only has value to Barrick due to the obvious reasons. DAndrew-2/17/1999
2790 Naan,I don't mean to be disrespectful but right now the market is paying beDouglas-2/17/1999
2789 John, Just my opinion and I could be wrong. The way I see it is that BarrickPianoman1997-2/17/1999
2788 "A legitimate Bre-X" sounds like an oxymoron to me. You haven't lDev-2/17/1999
2787 In hindsight,everybody who didn't sell at $5+ is a loser.I read all the anaJohn BOYCE-2/17/1999
2786quote.yahoo.com - not a very convincing fill of the gap, sort of bungee-jumped rmarcos-2/17/1999
2785 John, I wonder if SCQ is a candidate for a farm in? (High sulfidation systems ateevee-2/17/1999
2784 Naan - I thought that you were using the $50/ounce figure as the value of gold Enigma-2/17/1999
2783 Naan, You are very aggressive (not at all conservative) with your use of $50USSyncrude-2/17/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News