SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Trading the markets.....
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
4583 45 0
Emcee:  GROUND ZERO™ Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2808Hi GZ, Yea its time to test.That will set up some nice long term trend lines. robert b furman-1/20/2001
2807I doubt it will be as big as 150 until we get back to the 3000 zone. It'd beMoominoid-1/20/2001
2806Good eye, yes you're right... I've notice that also... what we have is aGROUND ZERO™-1/20/2001
2805We could work sideways for a while... my near term time frame is for a move to aGROUND ZERO™-1/20/2001
2804I don't pay much attention to valuations since I'm strictly technical...GROUND ZERO™-1/20/2001
2803Seems like we are just moving sideways bmaking a solid base just above the rectaMoominoid-1/19/2001
2802By the way the three previous days are lot like the three of your Lindahl wiggleMoominoid-1/19/2001
2801GZ I wasn't doubting that the index might go there but even at this point NMoominoid-1/19/2001
2800Just as well, smart move at this level...<g> we could pull back some earlGROUND ZERO™-1/19/2001
2799Good advise. I got out quite quickly as soon as I got disillusioned with the strsandeep-1/19/2001
2798Be cool and don't over commit.....<g> GZGROUND ZERO™-1/19/2001
2797Me? Bearish? Not likely.....<g> maybe a pull back next week, but not bearGROUND ZERO™-1/19/2001
2796There might be some sellers next week, but I'm holding on for the bigger movGROUND ZERO™-1/19/2001
2795Good question, but I wouldn't think so... sorry for the late reply, I was atGROUND ZERO™-1/19/2001
2794Trying to get flat QQQ calls here. Having some problems with my online broker.Magnatizer-1/19/2001
2793I was thinking you and Skeet....William H Huebl-1/19/2001
2792Also, that would mean that the earlier high was 2 years too early. This time it sandeep-1/19/2001
2791Long again at 2672 and DOW also. Let's rock these things higher...sandeep-1/19/2001
2790Hi Dave, SSHHHH - you'll start a stampede!!! gggggg Bobrobert b furman-1/19/2001
2789I'm just thinking we just had the biggest single year percentage fall on a UMoominoid-1/19/2001
2788Trade Took profits on 1/2 position. Now holding long 1/6th bucket load of QQQ Magnatizer-1/19/2001
2787Hi Dave agreed, Bobrobert b furman-1/19/2001
2786Hi Dave, It would be considered a breakout. You have to remember it is a markerobert b furman-1/19/2001
2785Well yesterday I got back to the March 2000 high on my portfolio (not counting mMoominoid-1/19/2001
2784If the NAS went back up to the old highs in a 12 month time frame, wouldn't Moominoid-1/19/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News