SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency?
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3887 2 0
Emcee:  Proud_Infidel Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2812Nov 7 Bush was up by 1725 First recount he was up by 930 Second recourt he was uThe Phoenix-11/28/2000
2811X, <b>"I wonder if this will revitalize people politically?"<William Brotherson-11/28/2000
2810> <i>I respect your intentions,</i> < Somehow I'm not conEllen-11/28/2000
2809Let's get one thing straight. The votes were ALL counted. Some were not reThe Philosopher-11/28/2000
2808cutiger, As I have said... and this will be my last post since it's a futilThe Phoenix-11/28/2000
2807During the "Republican riot" no one was arrested and quite a few policJLIHAI-11/28/2000
2806Seems to me they should look at those 200 votes then rather than throw out the rThe Phoenix-11/28/2000
2805So you're suggesting that Bush was arguing that the law was inconsistent andThe Phoenix-11/28/2000
2804<i>Why should 3 Democratic canvassing board members be allowed to analyze Benchman-11/28/2000
2803I don't either. I don't even know California election law all that well.epicure-11/28/2000
2802It already hasn't been done. Of course, if Bush wins the SC case it may hapThe Philosopher-11/28/2000
2801Not to be mean spirited, but it must not take much to scare you. I believe thatcutiger-11/28/2000
2800If the law is violated in the requesting or filing out of voting documents of anepicure-11/28/2000
2799"The Republicans also are seeking to block an effort by Democrats that coulThe Philosopher-11/28/2000
2798<i> I also beleive it's pretty clear and verified that some folThe Philosopher-11/28/2000
2797Ellen...do you know by any chance WHO pays for each requested recount??? I beliKLP-11/28/2000
2796But the ballot isn't tainted, just the request. As CB pointed out, what wasThe Philosopher-11/28/2000
2795Are you sure?The Phoenix-11/28/2000
2794Actually you are right - they weren't riots but what I saw on TV was pretty The Phoenix-11/28/2000
2793I doubt that we will ever hear from a media source that Jackson led a mob. It wcutiger-11/28/2000
2792Tainted ballots get discarded, that is the weight of precedential authority I beepicure-11/28/2000
2791Yep. But if filling in the names was illegal, that doesn't dictate the remeThe Philosopher-11/28/2000
2790so we can't change the rules on those seminole county absentees, can we? weepicure-11/28/2000
2789In fact the next election will be far more important than the presidential, sincThe Philosopher-11/28/2000
2788We shall see. I don't think it will turn them off. But the only way to knoepicure-11/28/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):