SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MTIC - Is this the next EMC?
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3748 35 0 MTIC
Emcee:  David Farnham Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2823 OT - if the MTIC'ers object to this OT, please let me know and I'll cartom pope-10/6/1998
2822 OT - LGTO Well, I still have my 62 shares! Now 32. Are you making another buytom pope-10/6/1998
2821 OT, but I know many here follow LGTO. Tom, did you see 36 this mornings w/highgmccon-10/6/1998
2820 I'm in no rush to buy more...this market is too toxic. If/when we retest BostonView-10/5/1998
2819 Lee, I wouldn't put any emphasis to this in a buy or sell decision since thMark T. Heath-10/5/1998
2818 Thread, Look at all the call activity,and very little puts. Can anyone make sLee-10/5/1998
2817 Your Welcome! Now, are you taking advantage of this buying oppourtunity! NickNick-10/4/1998
2816 OT Last week I caught CIEN on the move on heavy volume from 11 to 14. So I iggmccon-10/3/1998
2815 OT Greg - so am I when it explodes in my face like this. Seriously, I use limtom pope-10/3/1998
2814 I'm surprised you "limit" your orders, Tom. gmccon-10/2/1998
2813 Nice jinx, Nick. BostonView-10/2/1998
2812 OT <<<i>LGTO: Buy at 39! <<</i> Another tale of LGTO tom pope-10/2/1998
2811 LGTO: Buy at 39! I got out at 49. Just kidding about buying. Market's ingmccon-10/2/1998
2810 All things considered, MTIC only down about $1 this week (hopefully it continueNick-10/2/1998
2809 >> This company needs to talk about it's success << It first ngmccon-9/30/1998
2808 Then you have not read a recent EMC announcement! Even if the customer was an Nick-9/29/1998
2807 My reading, then re-reading of the news piece tells me that WED was an existinggmccon-9/29/1998
2806 BV Good point on the "hype-alert". As for my previous post, it is lNick-9/29/1998
2805 I have issued "hype-alerts" in the past but this one is different. ABostonView-9/29/1998
2804 Im not sure I remember seeing announcements like this in the past naming specifNick-9/29/1998
2803 BV, I may be a little harsh, but it seemed last time management pumped out a mLee-9/29/1998
2802 Finally, at long last, a little something to cheer about. Of course, I never BostonView-9/29/1998
2801 Nick, the last consensus # I saw was .14., so .12 ain't too hot, and as I rBostonView-9/28/1998
2800 The latest insider purchases that I see on Zacks are those by NFT Ventures on 6tom pope-9/28/1998
2799 What was the expectation for the quarter and how does .12 hold up! Nick-9/28/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):