SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
ARP - V Argentina Gold
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3282 13 0 ARP
Emcee:  Steve Wright Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2832 <<Unless they just gambled ABX would sweeten the bid right away and lost?Claude Cormier-2/18/1999
2831 That's probably correct but Barrick has an accounting problem that they wouElizabeth Andrews-2/18/1999
2830 Gord, there's no need to get in a flap. I'm not short ARP anymore and IElizabeth Andrews-2/18/1999
2829 Elizabeth, It is common knowledge that Barrick has very recently become some whteevee-2/18/1999
2828 Amable Target Hole 108, collared 10 metres east of hole 80 and drilled vGord Bolton-2/18/1999
2827 Ray, if they drill anymore holes like 108 they may as well shoot themselves. ThElizabeth Andrews-2/18/1999
2826 Hi Darren, I wouldn't call this play "insignificant" but do agrewhiskeyjack-2/18/1999
2825Message 7501425 When I mentioned I posted something earlier I couldn't findMr. Oil-2/18/1999
2824 WJ, I think Barrick secretly wanted this deposit. Now it seems to be armoured aBill Jackson-2/18/1999
2823 If he screwed up on such an insignificant deposit, what would he do to a large DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck-2/18/1999
2822 The point is that he had the same stock position before and after - so as far aEnigma-2/18/1999
2821 «Yes but he didn't really - having sold his existing stock for the samPianoman1997-2/18/1999
2820 Dan <<On top of it an insider made a 5.50 $ financing.>> Yes but heEnigma-2/18/1999
2819 Robert,do you think fund manager's have never been wrong before? Douglas Douglas-2/18/1999
2818 I don't check in here very often so my apologies if this has been discusswhiskeyjack-2/18/1999
2817 « IMO, they know that Amable is reaching its limits.» Claude, IMO ifPianoman1997-2/18/1999
2816 What is wrong with a 50 m step out holes? That seems a reasonable amount if yoMr. Oil-2/18/1999
2815 Syncrude, I think too many shares are in strong hands and this will have to plaBill Jackson-2/18/1999
2814 Bill, I think that if Barrick had stuck with their original $5.50 they could hSyncrude-2/18/1999
2813 Syncrude, Had they offered an 89% premium for ARP they may have won that war toBill Jackson-2/18/1999
2812 Steve, Those recent holes were nothing to write home about, no big stepout nor Bill Jackson-2/18/1999
2811 << Barrick buys Sutton at a PREMIUM versus the REDUCED offer for ArgentinClaude Cormier-2/18/1999
2810 <<Why is a company that is in a hurry to raise expectations to 20 millionClaude Cormier-2/18/1999
2809 There will not be another bidder with the fall-off on those grades. DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck-2/18/1999
2808 Sounds like a replay, Gitennes with great results on early holes, wooed by majsmokey w.-2/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):