SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS/USRX
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1384 5 0 COMS
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
284 Jon, >Not to take sides or anything, but those who were taunting the shortHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
283 I'm new to this thread and obviously can't read thru every post here, ssteve berman-2/28/1997
282 Kimble, > I would like to know there reasoning behind accepting an offer foHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
281 >Deal may not go thru if shareholder's vote it down, which I'm expecHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
280 Fred, >Well, there are at least three of us who are willing to give Cowell Hassell Anderson-2/28/1997
279 Scrapps, The officers and board members of USRX hold a lot of their own stock.Hassell Anderson-2/28/1997
278 john Well, I just read the last 100 posts or so, and I think we're all beithe dodger-2/28/1997
277 BW, >USRX: YOU JUST GOT 3CONNED. USRX shareholders really got screwed in tHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
276 Pig Monger, >I'm bleeding: like a stuck pig. Oink, oink, someone pleaseHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
275 Tulvio, >What transformed yesterday's euphoria into today's despairHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
274 Scrapps, >The more I look at this deal the more fishy it looks. The price iHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
273 Ramsey, >The insiders of the merger talks obviously know a lot more than weHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
272 David, >Remember, the shareholders of both companies have to approve the deHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
271 Sunny, >If COMS supported Rok's technology that would be fine as they sHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
270 Jon, >Well, people are just way too optimistic sometimes... Count me amongHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
269 Scrapps, I put in for the Courier upgrade week's ago. Still waiting. Thandrmorgan-2/28/1997
268 Derek where can I download my 56K x2 software??? If it is turned on why haven&Scrapps-2/28/1997
267 Mine is AT&T worldnet, which I am not happy with at all, their customer carScrapps-2/28/1997
266 I have been talking about the price because that is all I know about so far, thScrapps-2/28/1997
265 Scrapps, <<Not one analyst has said the price was right...>> ReadEric Prigge-2/28/1997
264 Scrapps, I can't remember who your ISP is? Do they support x2? <b> drmorgan-2/28/1997
263 Touche!!! ROFLOLScrapps-2/28/1997
262 Fred, Derek I guess I gotta go get me one of them modems with twice pipes and sScrapps-2/28/1997
261 I, too, am very much at ease by the merger. I think it's a good fit. Yes,Gopher Baroque-2/28/1997
260 Then do it the easy way.... although that my wind you up with Folsom Prison BluEric Prigge-2/28/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News