SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Trickle Portfolio
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1784 65 0
Emcee:  tuck Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
284Excuse me whilst I apply some WD-40 to the distal pulley of my right pinky. Thetuck-12/22/2000
283Fellow TrickleMavens, There come times when one must make pivotal decisions faituck-12/22/2000
282smh, If you like GNSL, what do you think of QGENF? Here's one of the more tuck-12/21/2000
281Wilder, I've recently seen wins by BDAL, APBiotech (of NYE), and another ontuck-12/20/2000
280smh & TrickleMavens, Have come across ASTM from time to time; don't knotuck-12/20/2000
279Wilder, Don't know the answer. I do know I am buying today. Also MCDE. Mesmh-12/20/2000
278smh brought gnsl's recent PR to that thread's attention. This tid bit ikeokalani'nui-12/20/2000
277Tuck, Don't know what the resident gurus think of ASTM (http://www.aastrosmh-12/19/2000
276Rick, >>BioWhitaker...... in the olden days, lots of cell culture media, tuck-12/18/2000
275<i>Cambrex rings bells. Suspect they are private or a division of someone scaram(o)uche-12/18/2000
274Tuck, well that was it for the "classic SI look." Switching to the nePseudo Biologist-12/18/2000
273PB, Are you guys not able to see the Portfolio? Went over to T/FIF just now. tuck-12/18/2000
272<i>Can anyone comment on how the subject message looks? Does it fit on youPseudo Biologist-12/18/2000
271Thanks, Tom, For your kind words and your input. I appreciate your checking thtuck-12/18/2000
270looks fine to me, Tuck, and let me add how I admire your perseverance, hard worktom pope-12/18/2000
269TECH getting mushed by tax loss selling, it would appear. I cannot find negativtuck-12/18/2000
268I see AGNT has easily taken out my buy target of $8. Trickle will nibble 200 shtuck-12/18/2000
267Nigel, You being a newshound, you probably saw this about PBSC. A little win ftuck-12/18/2000
266Arrrgh! Modified subject but had trouble with formatting the taxonomy again, detuck-12/17/2000
265Thanks, Rick, I figure that by playing the chemists off against the biologists tuck-12/17/2000
264>> I heard somewhere biologists want everything done for them. << Tscaram(o)uche-12/17/2000
263smh, Even the teaser is kind of interesting, as it lists several companies Ituck-12/17/2000
262PB, >>Cytokine Mini-Reviews? Chemistry? Basic immunology more like it<tuck-12/17/2000
261Tuck, You may find this of interest. At a 5K/copy I'm sure you can't resmh-12/16/2000
260The R&D Systems catalog always came out with those superb mini-reviews. Prescaram(o)uche-12/16/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News