SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Biotech for less than cash value
An SI Board Since April 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
684 125 0
Emcee:  RWReeves Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
284inhx didn't pay much for fmvr. fmrv compounds seem promising but early. Gorkrw-8/21/2007
283INHX is hooking up with FMVR.OB - how is that going to work? Bunch more shares tSteve Lokness-8/21/2007
282LXRX is the only one on the list I'm looking at (FWTW).nigel bates-8/21/2007
281potp is effectively bankrupt, so be careful on that one. On lxrx, big chunk of rkrw-8/21/2007
280Thanks for the list. There are 3 other companies that might qualify... Lexiconpgo-neil-8/21/2007
279I don't have a clue re. the frequency of bad genes that makes good sense, ecscaram(o)uche-8/20/2007
278Batten Disease! Never heard of it before. With such an awful prognosis - might tSteve Lokness-8/20/2007
277Yeah, well, ok. And maybe there's something in the 3M patents that others wscaram(o)uche-8/20/2007
276But, please, don't hold back and do tell us how you <b>really</b>Pseudo Biologist-8/20/2007
275I think that it might have been the same biofreak who told TD to avoid the stockscaram(o)uche-8/20/2007
274Fighting words :-) <<<<However, I should note, at the last beer brkrw-8/20/2007
273I like COLY as a bet on TLR technology. However, I should note, at the last beerBulbaMan-8/20/2007
272Tough call. I probably wouldn't have guessed prcs last time!rkrw-8/20/2007
271Any winners here in your opinion? I have sold CRGN (when it sold third wave), RNSteve Lokness-8/20/2007
270<i>only one of the bunch did well</i> That's discouraging. It mMike McFarland-8/20/2007
269Using 6/30 cash on hand and not including debt, these are at >90% cash/marketrkrw-8/20/2007
268Mike; Looks like you can move up INHX a notch. TGEN, DYAX and now INHX. Not sSteve Lokness-11/27/2006
267Recap.com maintains a database of biotechs MC vs cash on hand, or at least it ditom pope-11/20/2006
266Losers: prcs MC has declined 31% to $22M dovp MC has declined 82% to $6M LittleMike McFarland-11/20/2006
265Steve, no arguing, not many bios get to sub cash without bungling their way therrkrw-6/26/2006
264Sub cash seems less important than how it is managed - or the plan to keep from Steve Lokness-6/26/2006
263Deleted - duplicative!Robohogs-6/26/2006
262Minus the money for the shareholders' lawyers of course! JonRobohogs-6/26/2006
261ANDS. That was fast. $90/100 (as of 3/31).rkrw-6/26/2006
260I guess I should be happy that I don't own any of those, but I remember thintom pope-6/23/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News