SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Gary Dobry Subpoenas 41 SI Aliases
An SI Board Since January 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1136 63 0
Emcee:  Janice Shell Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
286Marcos, actually, I believe that my first post on OVIS was #reply-2088860. ZeevZeev Hed-1/24/2002
285To Hogger's credit, he has made a complete turnaround. And now sees Pugs andSalemsHex-1/24/2002
284Actually that is true. You can ignore a suboena and without action from the bencTideGlider-1/24/2002
283Then I guess you could always ignore a subpoena, if it is not an "order of The Duke of URL©-1/24/2002
282I am sorry. It is funny, but we all used to save all those URLs and we remember TideGlider-1/24/2002
281No it is not an order of the court. An "order of the court" only comesTideGlider-1/24/2002
280Yes Hogger is a hard core guy, but not nearly as stupid as PUGsTideGlider-1/24/2002
279Thanks. I knew <i>of</i> them, but very little <i>about</i&Bill Ulrich-1/24/2002
278You know, of course that EFF is Mitch Kapor's baby. The modern day equivaleThe Duke of URL©-1/24/2002
277Good find, Duke.Bill Ulrich-1/24/2002
276Well, lookee here, Arcane Lore, eat your heart out. :))) : One: I guess this isThe Duke of URL©-1/24/2002
275The actual suit is in Chicago. The RB subpoena is in Boston, whilst the SI subpoBill Ulrich-1/24/2002
274Thanks ... actually i think this stuff is quite on-topic as it goes straight to marcos-1/24/2002
273Historians agree <b>or</b&gGraystone-1/24/2002
272Can you expand that a bit? It suggests that Richter would be using (hypotheticalBill Ulrich-1/24/2002
271Bill, I'm just noodlin' here, but, do you think that SI's (infospaceThe Duke of URL©-1/24/2002
270<i>Ancient History - Secrets of the Past This poster has a unique distinctMark_H-1/24/2002
269Mailboxes Etc... <b>or</b&gGraystone-1/24/2002
268CYGS....IF I recall, the CEO conducted biz from a lawn chair on the beach in MiaJane4IceCream-1/24/2002
267the ultimate in the sypathetic pumper :) To:John D. Morrison who wrote (358) TideGlider-1/24/2002
266Bio flak <b>or</b&gGraystone-1/24/2002
265Mirrored from www6.law.com Computer Law Discovering the Identity of Anonymous scion-1/24/2002
264Well, missed this last night - Good decision SI ... smart business move to not pmarcos-1/24/2002
263There you are!! Missed reading you on SI. I remember CYGS and the "shrimpJane4IceCream-1/24/2002
262<i>Mark_H, who said: Could you please explain what this means? I'm notThe Duke of URL©-1/24/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News