SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Employee Stock Options - NQSOs & ISOs
An SI Board Since June 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
786 22 0
Emcee:  rkral Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
286chaz, That's a good letter you wrote to the Senators. That's something rkral9/3/2002
285Ron: There aren't very many of us posting here, which is really too bad. I hchaz8/31/2002
284Huey... I have no quibble with their expense method. As I said in my first postchaz8/30/2002
283Ron... Thanks you for the welcome. I hope you'll find my thoughts useful. Schaz8/30/2002
282Siebel: <i>Note that the stock to be issued is true restricted stock. I ghueyone8/30/2002
281Hi Chaz, Good to see you. You have lots of interesting ideas there and I look hueyone8/30/2002
280chaz, Welcome to the thread. I'll be looking forward to hearing why you berkral8/30/2002
279Siebel to exchange some options for stock or cash ... Excerpts from post by rkral8/30/2002
278To The Thread... I have come to the view that executive compensation via stock chaz8/30/2002
277Cendant's announcement to expense stock options beginning in 2003 brings thehueyone8/29/2002
276Hi Chaz: I am looking forward to your posts. Here is an example of a company mhueyone8/29/2002
275Huey... I still plan to get over here and present my thoughts, but I just havenchaz8/28/2002
274Thanks Ron: Thanks for providing the links. I think I am going to have to readhueyone8/27/2002
273Huey, re FAS 123 accounting of restricted stock .. First to your question. >rkral8/27/2002
272<I>Do you know what the rationale is for expensing stock options when theyExacctnt8/26/2002
271<i>I haven't seen evidence of this practice, at least not from respecthueyone8/26/2002
270<i>An older article with a view of True Cost of Stock Options.</i> hueyone8/26/2002
269<I>I also recently read a post claiming that during the height of the bubbExacctnt8/26/2002
268An older article with a view of True Cost of Stock Options. fwcook.com This sitExacctnt8/26/2002
267Thanks for the explanation of accounting for restricted stock. Obviously there hueyone8/26/2002
266<I>From your post I see that restricted stock is valued at date of grant aExacctnt8/26/2002
265<I>"Illustration 1 - Fixed Stock Option" debits "CompensatiExacctnt8/26/2002
264<i>One aspect of the intrinsic value method that I don't agree with ishueyone8/24/2002
263Thanks Ron, <i>This may not be representative of the corporate tax accounhueyone8/24/2002
262Huey, re restricted stock grant and employee taxes .. rowbotham.com seems like rkral8/24/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News