SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Formerly About SanDisk
An SI Board Since August 2009
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1161 8 0 SNDK
Emcee:  sylvester80 Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
286Thanks, I find your posts insightful and informative. BTW how do you post imagesMad211/6/2009
285Thanks for the link, mad2. I posted the NAND stats here: Message 26075803 and OSam11/5/2009
284dramexchange.com Dram analysis 2Q to 3Q by brand (doesn't include private lMad211/5/2009
283On the issue of Micron, don't forget that MU is also in the DRAM business. Asylvester8011/5/2009
282Looks that way. A 40% haircut in just 1 day. Unbelievable carnage. Still that $1sylvester8011/4/2009
281sylvester, the market does not buy into the longterm prospects of STEC and that sndk_longterm11/4/2009
280Sign of life from STEC at 14.34. That level closes all the gaps open from the $1sylvester8011/4/2009
279Darn it... I can't find any historical earnings and sales data. Does anyone sylvester8011/4/2009
278Just went back and looked at a 3 year chart of STEC and the stock was at $14 bacsylvester8011/4/2009
277You could very well be right. STEC is down almost 40% today and still no bounce sylvester8011/4/2009
276Thanks Sam. All useful information. Now if I can only figure out what to do withsylvester8011/4/2009
275<i>No stock is down 36% if the market doesn't clearly see this as the Sam11/4/2009
274Sylvester, I've always thought STEC was not a long term play. They are nothisndk_longterm11/4/2009
273Well, Ms Van Hees of Wedbush can change her mind rather quickly. I heard her askSam11/4/2009
272This is because insiders dumped so many shares. They likely knew what was comingRockyBalboa11/4/2009
271Just FWIW, If you look at the fib retracements from the top $42.5 down to $14, tsylvester8011/4/2009
270This is how good Wedbush's analysis is. A day afetr upgrading and putting onsylvester8011/4/2009
269Analyst Comments - STEC Inc (STEC): Colour on quarter November 4, 2009 8:11 AM Esylvester8011/4/2009
268I should have also added that it is also possible for the stock to go test the 2sylvester8011/4/2009
267Did some technical analysis this morning and based on some trend lines and fib rsylvester8011/4/2009
266Yes I saw that. But even STEC was not very specific if that will come to be. Aftsylvester8011/4/2009
265.RockyBalboa11/4/2009
264<i>We recently received preliminary indications that our customer might caSam11/3/2009
263The relationship is the area of each die. 32 * 32 / 43 * 43 = 1024 / 1849 = .5Woody_Nickels11/3/2009
2624:11PM STEC Inc beats by $0.03, beats on revs; guides Q4 EPS in-line, revs belowSam11/3/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News