SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
SNRS- Sunrise Technologies
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4140 25 0 SNRS
Emcee:  WILLIAM BLACK Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2865 Thanks for the update, does anyone know how much longer it will take them to geSnowShredder-7/26/1999
2864 July 26, 1999 Dear Shareholder, Last week, the FDA's Ophthalmic DevicesBARRY ALLEN-7/26/1999
2863 Responses to frequently answered questions posted on the SNRS web site: biz.yaGlenn Petersen-7/26/1999
2862 The view of an outsider - for what it is worth I looked at SNRS and did not buWalter in HK-7/26/1999
2861 Just passing through. As I was looking for a replay of the conference call of Starowl-7/25/1999
2860 Below are some of the "non-biased" ODP members who voted 4-3 to apprBARRY ALLEN-7/25/1999
2859 It doesn't sound like you are leaving the stock behind even though you haveDouble E-7/25/1999
2858 Barry, I agree 100% with you!! Someone, or several someones, HAD TO SEE THOSE Double E-7/25/1999
2857 Someone mentioned on Raging Bull that there might be a trading halt on Monday. BARRY ALLEN-7/25/1999
2856 SNRS thread. Unfortunately I was very heavily invested in SNRS (about 90% of mJoe-7/25/1999
2855 The SNRS board on Raging Bull has been the most active. There are numerous postBARRY ALLEN-7/25/1999
2854 Sylvester, It's ironic how the only person I see who made out "extremmajormember-7/25/1999
2853 OT : a company doing it the right way coii is flying below radar--this is a gchirodoc-7/25/1999
2852 My response HUWITO, Your quote from Dr. Sanders were interesting and maybe Sylvester-7/25/1999
2851 Skane, all. There's a lot of nonsence on Raging Bull and then there some grSylvester-7/25/1999
2850 And I'm not trying to get personal either. Sorry. But if you ask me the &qJacques Chitte-7/25/1999
2849 Hey! I'm not sitting in judgement. I'm just telling the story as I seeHerbVic-7/25/1999
2848 > A company plays a little fast and loose with the ethics of medical discoveJacques Chitte-7/25/1999
2847 >I am sure the panel felt "at risk" if they approved the procedureBart Hoenes-7/25/1999
2846 >>On another matter, since over 11 millions shares traded Friday, who waHerbVic-7/25/1999
2845 >>>>says the company knew they were going to be substantially delamajormember-7/25/1999
2844 >I am sure the panel felt "at risk" if they approved the procedurJacques Chitte-7/25/1999
2843 There is no news here imo. The only thing that is spin bordering on libel is SJacques Chitte-7/25/1999
2842 <i> This whole question of the eye correction only lasting 18 months, whBARRY ALLEN-7/24/1999
2841 Skane and all, I have been out of SNRS for some months now as I could not justPeter van Steennis-7/24/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):