SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Neocon's Seminar Thread
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1112 21 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
287I have not seen Stomp, and have no clear idea if it is any good. Was it choreogrNeocon-2/17/2001
286Yes, that is true. Rejection of the premise would kind of obviate examination ofNeocon-2/17/2001
285Well, I am relieved that we are back to a normative framework, based, presumablyNeocon-2/17/2001
284On a lighter topic, have you ever been to a performance of Stomp? Kristel wantsD. Long-2/16/2001
283I am in agreement with you on that point. However, I am coming from a position D. Long-2/16/2001
282Sorry for not responding sooner, but I had my "weekend" then I've D. Long-2/16/2001
281You are right, Tannhauser should be innocuous.....Neocon-2/16/2001
280All this is about is a minstrel who is torn between worshipping Venus or the VirTom Clarke-2/16/2001
279Wagner is the one exception to my general rule of setting politics aside. I findNeocon-2/16/2001
278Going to see Tannhauser tonight. It will be my first Wagner opera in person.Tom Clarke-2/16/2001
277Okay, only that means that you are not arguing in favor of normative judgments, Neocon-2/10/2001
276I am not sure that we are in fundamental disagreement, though we may be. My poinNeocon-2/10/2001
275I think we are arguing past each other here, or missing what one of us is tryingD. Long-2/9/2001
274But neither provides any basis for an evaluation of the *existence* of deity at D. Long-2/9/2001
273There is no basis for either concluding that one account is truer than another, Neocon-2/9/2001
272It is pretty simple. You were the one claiming to reason from "human natureNeocon-2/9/2001
271Then gao, you see a cup half full, and I see a cup half empty! ;) DerekD. Long-2/9/2001
270But the important fact of radical freedom remains - there is nothing preventing D. Long-2/9/2001
269Who is correct? IMO, Thomas Jefferson. Who has proof of God? Who has proof otgao seng-2/9/2001
268I respect your opinion, but personally I see no difference between a deity creatD. Long-2/9/2001
267For that matter, the Lord of Hosts, forgive my impiety, was created by us. no gao seng-2/9/2001
266I accept a narrowing of the question. You are right, the primary sociological faNeocon-2/8/2001
265Are we looking into Nietzsche's black chasm, Neo? The Nazis and Stalin showD. Long-2/8/2001
264There is a necessary distinction between imputed values and inherent values. ForNeocon-2/8/2001
263I don't think I can stress enough my admiration for Durkheim here, most espeD. Long-2/8/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News