SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?*
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
30916 91 0 IDTC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
29066more poetry from carrera, >>>>The forum isn't that scary. The pprof.Hacky-7/31/2003
29065Both are me. I e-mailed you and then posted. JulesJules B. Garfunkel-7/30/2003
29064hi jules, yes. but I went into my email account to delete forum posts, and discarreraspyder-7/30/2003
29063carreraspyder, Its the same Jules G. there, as is here. JulesJules B. Garfunkel-7/30/2003
29062..ah so, the jules I referenced a couple of posts ago is not our jules, but a dicarreraspyder-7/30/2003
29061..I finally recollected a very vague memory of your untimely demise, but nothingcarreraspyder-7/30/2003
29060Actually I did. Greenberg in the prepared statement said that he would be able tSmear_campaign-7/30/2003
29059If you are concerned enough about the 7/31 date to go back and listen carefully carreraspyder-7/30/2003
29058So what you are saying is you guys did it again. All the hype regarding a pendiSteve Fancy-7/30/2003
29057...it's being hashed over in that 'private place.' under promise; ocarreraspyder-7/30/2003
29056I don't care what Blaylock says, NTOP's q and a session at the last cc sSmear_campaign-7/30/2003
29055for however it relates to events, Blaylock had said July 31 in their original rcarreraspyder-7/30/2003
29054Clearly they don't want you posting nflop stuff on the itxc thread. More thSteve Fancy-7/30/2003
29053The harder you guys work it, the less impact it seems to have. Does this suggesSteve Fancy-7/30/2003
29052Hey, where's the hcon anyway? Other than the one cocky post on the ITXC thrSteve Fancy-7/30/2003
29051Get over it and sue me...LOL! Typical Hcon, all mouth, no action. You hardcoreSteve Fancy-7/30/2003
29050Sorry, wrong person so deleted:) SteveSteve Fancy-7/30/2003
29049Nice work carrera !! that must have taken you an hour to compile. it's noprof.Hacky-7/30/2003
29048To:Hawaii60 who wrote (27820) From: Steve Fancy Friday, Sep 6, 2002 3:30 PM Rescarreraspyder-7/30/2003
29047(I've inserted * where profanity was used) WOWO BEING TAKEN IN BY STEVE, ANcarreraspyder-7/30/2003
29046STEVE – aka suggardawdy, conbusterhsixo, whybuyebay, and about 20 more aliases. carreraspyder-7/30/2003
29045Looks like you went a little overboard on the who board today Hcon:) Breaking oSteve Fancy-7/30/2003
29044Hcon, we'll try this one more time and this will be my stock response to youSteve Fancy-7/29/2003
29043Get a life dude...LOL! I noticed you guys have many of the old names out in forSteve Fancy-7/29/2003
29042huh, I'm not sure if that sounds like a recommendation -- "if they'carreraspyder-7/29/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News