SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Speedfam [SFAM] Lovers Unite !
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3736 42 0 SFAM
Emcee:  AJ Berger Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2911 In terms of the "competitiveness" of the Ontrak tool, I am a bit confRob-Chemist-3/26/1998
2910 Mr. Sam, Katherine, John G., and Thread: Unless I've ben reading your postSemiBull-3/26/1998
2909 Mr. Sam, the $300 M of securities NVLS will register will be enough to buy eithQ.-3/26/1998
2908 Hmmmm, indeed... KatherineKatherine Derbyshire-3/25/1998
2907 >>I don't have any information that leads me to the conclusion that SKatherine Derbyshire-3/25/1998
2906 >>Re: "On-Trak polisher is not competitive." For some reaKatherine Derbyshire-3/25/1998
2905 Re: "On-Trak polisher is not competitive." For some reason, that surInvestor2-3/25/1998
2904 Katherine, I just looked on EDGAR and found that NVLS filed an S-3 on March 16,Mr. Sam-3/25/1998
2903 Komag is now warning of a sequential drop in revenues of 55% (they already warnDavid Kuspa-3/25/1998
2902 Here is a brief article about a slowdown in CMP demand in Korea and Japan, &quoMr. Sam-3/25/1998
2901 Hello, Katherine. Welcome to our little corner of cyberspace. I've enjoyeMr. Sam-3/25/1998
2900 >>4) There continues to be a good chance that SFAM will be acquired by a Katherine Derbyshire-3/25/1998
2899 <<There have been 3 recent downgrades of EPS estimates by different analyMr. Sam-3/25/1998
2898 I finally listened to the conference call in its entirety and have only a few tMr. Sam-3/24/1998
2897 Don, <<The only positives is .... secondly many companies including SamsSemiBull-3/24/1998
2896 SFAM is sitting with P/E of 16.25 against this years earnings. Earnings growthTEColeman-3/24/1998
2895 Steve and Semi The more I think about a poss. Buyout of IPEC, the more it looDonald L. Dominicci-3/24/1998
2894 Mr Sam, There have been 3 recent downgrades of EPS estimates by different analMULIFAT-3/24/1998
2893 Nice summary, Nick. Thanks for taking the time.Mr. Sam-3/23/1998
2892 CC Notes: The conference call repeated a lot that was already in the press relNick Michell-3/23/1998
2891 Indeed, there is no way that deal would be done for cash. SFAM would not want Andy H-3/22/1998
2890 Guys, you've been spammed. That IPEC buyout was posted by someone who justJZGalt-3/22/1998
2889 Don, Just curious....why would SFAM buyout IPEC? TO get Intel business that tSemiBull-3/22/1998
2888 Hello Don I would like to offer up some questions for discussion on the threadSteve Tauscher-3/22/1998
2887 Interesting post from the IPEC thread regarding a buyout by SFAM. | ------ | ReDonald L. Dominicci-3/22/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News