SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MTIC - Is this the next EMC?
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3748 35 0 MTIC
Emcee:  David Farnham Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2948 Not 100% however I think the Sand's are from Texas(nope, California). FromNick-11/10/1998
2947 Sands Bros. is a regional based California investment/brokerage firm. The closMark T. Heath-11/10/1998
2946 Greg, <.15?> Report dated Nov. 6 on clearstation.com est. .18.....YahooKen W-11/10/1998
2945 Granted mgmt credibility is a ? But it would appear the COMS agreement along wiCHRIS DiIORIO-11/10/1998
2944 That number has to be based in a totally scientific wild guess. As I recall, tgmccon-11/10/1998
2943 Greg, I'm referring to this: biz.yahoo.com Regards, Lee Lee-11/10/1998
2942 Excuse me, Ken. .15? You mean Y99 earnings, right? This is the liar's clubgmccon-11/10/1998
2941 Greg, Ken, Don't think there will be a few earnings revisions in the near Lee-11/10/1998
2940 Real time says we missed our last opportunity to buy under 4. Until, that is, gmccon-11/10/1998
2939 Key word, "crap". Right you are, Ken. Thanks, Greggmccon-11/10/1998
2938 gm They are not listed in the history of upgrades or downgrade..I can't fiKen W-11/10/1998
2937 Are they one of the 5 or so houses officially covering the stock, or are they jgmccon-11/10/1998
2936 MTIC Sands Brothers downgrade....Gee, do you suppose the Bros. are short this Ken W-11/10/1998
2935 Heavy upward pressure this morning while the Market was strong. Good CNBC integmccon-11/10/1998
2934 "Net-net, not joining was my way of being one less log on the fire...I neeMark T. Heath-11/9/1998
2933 Zacks is now reporting: This Week Last Week(No change in MNick-11/9/1998
2932 Good points and good to see you back in with us. As for weather they have soldNick-11/9/1998
2931 I always get the numbers mixed up but I believe the 6200 has shipped in limitedjim nazium-11/9/1998
2930 Mark, after much consternation I passed on the suit. I weighed all the issues BostonView-11/8/1998
2929 Remember I'm long and not intending to insult, but I'm also practical, gmccon-11/8/1998
2928 Too bad, that is why although the principal of the suit is valid and warranted,Nick-11/8/1998
2927 Read the report and analyze it along with the past. Yes, it appears that they Nick-11/8/1998
2926 No, there is a very specific time parameter that you must fit to be eligible toMark T. Heath-11/8/1998
2925 I thought the suit represented all shareholders "burned". Isn't gmccon-11/8/1998
2924 Better watch your MYLX stock if MTIC can supply themselves with a controller. Mark T. Heath-11/8/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News