SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Diamond Multimedia
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4679 17 0 DIMD
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2954 Good objective post. Thanks, Jonathan.lml-9/3/1997
2953 Matt, There's no question that Diamond scored a coup by supporting the PerJonathan Quick-9/2/1997
2952 You should not read too much into insider sales of company officiers. The stocStevefoder-9/2/1997
2951 The "affiliated persons" is not a big deal to me personally. With oveMatt Kaarlela-9/2/1997
2950 MGMT. own 41% of shares, 467,000 not to much. Perhaps they need some cash to dDavid A. Emil-9/2/1997
2949 PRESIDENT AND 8 AFFILIATES FILED FORM 144 WITH THE SEC FOR 467,229 SHARES DURINSRM-9/2/1997
2948 I guess they didn't shake the tree hard enough..Good Luck to All!!Jimily-9/2/1997
2947 Jimily Stop wasting your time on Jonathan and his buddy. You take the horse toBULL-9/2/1997
2946 To all: "Micron Powerdigm XSU with Diamond's PERMEDIA 2-based Fire GLMatt Kaarlela-9/2/1997
2945 John..Talk about being repetitious..Well I'm sure some day you may find harJimily-9/1/1997
2944 Stockboy, One could say the same about ignoring fundamentals. JonathanJonathan Quick-9/1/1997
2943 Jonathan, >>I see no reason to change my bearish position>> Sure Stockboy-9/1/1997
2942 Jim, The links, quotes, and attributions are there for you to read at your leiJonathan Quick-9/1/1997
2941 This will bring all systems together..Don't you love standards..Think we wiJimily-8/31/1997
2940 I don't see a problem here..looks it's about time newsJimily-8/31/1997
2939 John..Prove one ..Only One statement and I will listen..Jimily-8/31/1997
2938 Dan, Did you miss the drop to $6-$7 over the same 2-3 month time frame? Are yJonathan Quick-8/31/1997
2937 Jim, I am asking you to "trust me" with regard to quality problems aJonathan Quick-8/31/1997
2936 TobaccoMan, It seems to me that the PCM issue is more Rockwell's concern, Jonathan Quick-8/31/1997
2935 Jonathan and Others, What is your take on the Townshend PCM patent issue with TobaccoMan-8/30/1997
2934 I can't beleive the Townshend PCM patent issue hasn't been brought up oDavid Lawrence-8/30/1997
2933 << I still say someone knows something that we ALL don't know! >&Jason Davis-8/30/1997
2932 Rod, What if the modems are only costing Diamond $15.00 to mfg..Volume, Volume,Jimily-8/29/1997
2931 Dan, I'll second that and say that he has not produced one shred of proof tJimily-8/29/1997
2930 Jim..Thanks.. Confirmed new Software product by SYCR.. Fix 2000..Call IR publicJimily-8/29/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News