SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?*
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
30916 91 0 IDTC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
29616You can't stand it can you...LOL! You're getting nastier than you were Steve Fancy-9/17/2003
29615Are we seeing a float issue or what?Smear_campaign-9/17/2003
29614Carrera, you have busted Steve so bad so often it's a wonder he even tries aHawaii60-9/17/2003
29613Steve, guess what?? Steve a/k/a cconbuster60_60 and net2crap on Yahoo – Who wocarreraspyder-9/17/2003
29612Steve Carrera isn't ignoring the question. Both he and I have answered it. CHawaii60-9/17/2003
29611SteveCon, yeah like you have me on ignore. Sicko is a kind word for you. When oHawaii60-9/17/2003
29610Sure, don't bother to look...LOL! Typical hcon/carrera style. Either ignorSteve Fancy-9/17/2003
29609I challenged you last time you posted that to compare notes with me on cons and Steve Fancy-9/17/2003
29608Jules, he really has become pitiful. Good news is others are pocketing real gainHawaii60-9/17/2003
29607So I assume your ignoring the question once again is your verification that you Steve Fancy-9/17/2003
29606SteveCon, you are a legend in your own mind. Let that be enough because you arenHawaii60-9/17/2003
29605Jules my friend, whenever you attack me like this it turns out you missed a few Steve Fancy-9/17/2003
29604You hit it, I bought today at $6.60 on a momentum play as it looked like the loySteve Fancy-9/17/2003
29603Pond-scum, Do we have another mis-truth here? Your mouth was shorting NTOP betweJules B. Garfunkel-9/17/2003
29602SteveCon, yeah right. In order to do that you would have had to have bought overHawaii60-9/17/2003
29601Wow! Nice day for the longs:) After booking a 60 cent gain, I put some money whSteve Fancy-9/17/2003
29600I see you're digging out some of the old aliases on the who today...LOL! I Steve Fancy-9/17/2003
29599Steve, I'm not worried about a thing. Especially not your little make believHawaii60-9/17/2003
29598ntop info re UBS presentation at Q-Series FTTP/VoIP Workshop - Race to the Triplcarreraspyder-9/17/2003
29597LOL! You are right, it was my choice, but that has nothing to do with it. If ySteve Fancy-9/17/2003
29596SteveCon, it's your choice to post under your real name. You who put it in tHawaii60-9/17/2003
29595Thanks Carrera, I proof as I go...LOL! I didn't read them to see what changeSteve Fancy-9/17/2003
29594Thats the difference between cons who post under aliases and those that post onlSteve Fancy-9/17/2003
29593Can't give ya details at the moment, but as I have stated, has nothing to doSteve Fancy-9/17/2003
29592..smear, the idt thing? idt has the controlling interest in ntop. if there is carreraspyder-9/17/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News