SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Safeguard Scientifics SFE
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4467 83 0 SFE
Emcee:  Mark Sagarin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2967 Michael: I look forward to your posts. They are among the best I've ever rGary Kao-5/26/1999
2966 Pro, OT You did not list your post as OT as Michael would have done. Micharobert miller-5/26/1999
2965 Adding my 2c, the OT postsfrom mp and others have been added at the request of still learning-5/26/1999
2964 Prolific, You were polite, and as stated, at least for me, you raised a valid pmichael r potter-5/26/1999
2963 Mike OT: What's your current take on FCGI? Has cooled off with the rest oMicawber-5/26/1999
2962 all of my time is significant prolific-5/26/1999
2961 Pro, Your computer must be really slow if it takes any significant time. bob robert miller-5/26/1999
2960 Michael First off - I was very polite and clearly stated I mean no disrespect aprolific-5/26/1999
2959 All, I think the "mutual fund" like ability for the small shareholdeJohn Arnopp-5/26/1999
2958 Michael, I have not posted on this board before. As a fairly new investor, I loEli-5/26/1999
2957 Prolific, 1. The posts are clearly labeled OT so it is easy to skip 2. Many domichael r potter-5/26/1999
2956 Disagree re: OT The common thread we have here on this board is our interest iEye2Net-5/26/1999
2955 Tom, I agree. When OT is clearly marked OT it is easy to bypass if you desirerobert miller-5/26/1999
2954 You are talking about following your stocks; I do not know which stocks you wanTom Bunge-5/26/1999
2953 Please call a TO on OT - about 10 of the last 14 posts are off OT. No disrespprolific-5/26/1999
2952 More information on the SFE direct share purchase program: biz.yahoo.com TeflTeflon-5/26/1999
2951 -OT- Why the pre-occupation with margin -OT- on the SFE thread? 1.If the viewsmichael r potter-5/26/1999
2950 -OT- re: NITE take on it now? The last buy was not well timed. Did not wait fmichael r potter-5/25/1999
2949 -OT-SL, I think some of the good ones to own going forward are many low pe stocmichael r potter-5/25/1999
2948 Agree with T and QCOM, however BRCM headed for trouble, IMO. If the name of theelvisdoc-5/25/1999
2947 <I>I am not itching to buy into the nutz at this point, but would considAllan Harris-5/25/1999
2946 Michael/Allan, et al: So where do you see the infamous buying oppty's? FWIstill learning-5/25/1999
2945 OT Michael What's your take on NITE now? Very OT I have YHOO approachingelvisdoc-5/25/1999
2944 <I>Who will they sell to-who will power the hoped for rally? </I> Allan Harris-5/25/1999
2943 -OT- After expressing a belief that a change in leadership had just taken placemichael r potter-5/25/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News