SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Verilink, long term hold?
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
522 8 0 VRLK
Emcee:  Scott Potter Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
297 I figure that we have a great buy under 7 and will fill the gap in the chart beJohnathan C. Doe-10/31/1997
296 Glad to hear about the big trades. I have a lot of faith in VRLK still. Johnathan C. Doe-10/29/1997
295 Hello, Jonathan. There was some heavy buying today with several purchases overBaoho Chang-10/29/1997
294 Oh yea of little faith - something like that. Why was I concerned about averagJohnathan C. Doe-10/29/1997
293 We have awakened from the dead again! SandraSandra-10/29/1997
292 Let's see if tommorrow isn't a down day again. That wouldn't surprJohnathan C. Doe-10/28/1997
291 A bit better mood today as am up 12%. Too bad had to pay the price of the dopeter ashley-10/28/1997
290 I think we will have more selling at least at the open tommorrow as I think theJohnathan C. Doe-10/27/1997
289 Yeah, right, "the mother of all buying opportunities"; I've gone peter ashley-10/27/1997
288 VRLK is at least having a nice day in this rainstorm in the techs. DATM also iJohnathan C. Doe-10/24/1997
287 Next 3 months, you might be right about 10 being the max. given the fundamentalJohnathan C. Doe-10/23/1997
286 Sure there is a chance this stock will tank, but it was certainly a quarter wpeter ashley-10/22/1997
285 Take a look at the 100 week chart on another company that was "going out oJohnathan C. Doe-10/22/1997
284 Hello, Jonathan. It was mentioned during the conference call that VRLK is gettBaoho Chang-10/22/1997
283 Reading your other post, I just say, it sure makes a difference where you buy aJohnathan C. Doe-10/22/1997
282 Considering that I bought VRLK at 5 7/8 and have no other position in it, I donJohnathan C. Doe-10/22/1997
281 re: something will improve down the road. Like the price of gold right? SoundsIntel Trader-10/22/1997
280 Dear Jon Doe, read the annual report. Are you a shareholder? Page 38: During fiIntel Trader-10/22/1997
279 Intel Trader, you are absolutely ridiculous. The management has done a great jJohnathan C. Doe-10/22/1997
278 Rather than confront me on my thinking, why don't you share some of your owJohnathan C. Doe-10/22/1997
277 Thomas, the basis is that they have a lot of deals with the major players and IJohnathan C. Doe-10/22/1997
276 Re: I expect VRLK to again run up into the 20's. Ditto to Thomas Scharf, plIntel Trader-10/21/1997
275 >> I expect VRLK to again run up into the 20's. << Please explaThomas Scharf-10/21/1997
274 I expect VRLK to again run up into the 20's. I would keep a core holding oJohnathan C. Doe-10/21/1997
273 Peter, believe me, I have an inkling about trading and know where you are cominIntel Trader-10/20/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):