SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
IPPs and Merchant Energy Co.s
An SI Board Since September 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3358 82 0
Emcee:  Larry S. Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2983I believe this had been telegraphed, but here it is: CHICAGO -- Exelon Corp. catom pope-11/23/2003
2982I think DUK is a reasonable risk/potential total return stock over the next few Larry S.-11/21/2003
2981Larry - You still like DUK here. Anderson seems to be doing the right things. AJohn Doyle-11/21/2003
2980CPN <i>From the Company's 10-Q filed on November 13, 2003: ==========tom pope-11/20/2003
2979Earnings report from Mirant (MIRKQ -- in chapter 11), summarized in a series of RCMac-11/19/2003
2978Am I naive, or is this an example of real incentive based compensation? 08:33 Etom pope-11/19/2003
297714 States File Suit in Attempt to Block New E.P.A. Rules nytimes.com By TERENCWinkman777-11/17/2003
2976Testimony by a NG expert. Copied from a Yahoo RRI MB post resourcescommittee.hoNDBFREE-11/17/2003
2975re ILA; Was looking at some Goldman notes on OGE, a ute with about 200M EBIT andMark Adams-11/16/2003
2974If DUK is to lower the dividend it likely will be part of a whole company shake-Larry S.-11/16/2003
2973From the WSJ. Still waiting for a really good analysis, including the effect of tom pope-11/16/2003
2972Larry - When do you think DUK will lower the dividend? Also didn't Buffet bJohn Doyle-11/15/2003
2971I wasn't watching the news yesterday; ILA announced another 300M asset sale.Mark Adams-11/14/2003
2970Sounds pretty rocky to me. Thanks for the analysis-makes me wonder whether we woMadharry-11/14/2003
2969Having happened on that previous article by chance, it reminded me of some efforMark Adams-11/13/2003
2968Well, that's an interesting insight into ILA. Thanks, Mark. Larry: re DUK. tom pope-11/13/2003
2967Good Old-fashioned Debt Not all fallen angels—companies whose credit rating hasMark Adams-11/13/2003
2966personal opinion: DUK offers exceptional capital gain potential over the next fLarry S.-11/13/2003
2965Anyone have an opinion on DUK...I saw there was a large insider buy today.John Doyle-11/13/2003
2964Intl Power considers mothballing some U.S. plants NEW YORK, Nov 12 (Reuters) NDBFREE-11/13/2003
2963Ray, I always appreciate your posts for their highly individual slant, but ittom pope-11/12/2003
2962Mr. Watt also noted that Standard & Poor's criteria adjustments would foRaymond Duray-11/12/2003
2961The credit decline since 2000 has been particularly severe because it has been dRaymond Duray-11/12/2003
2960FERC Commissioner Nora Brownell, prominent investors, and management participateRaymond Duray-11/12/2003
2959tom, I thought you might be interested in this as a follow-up to the Wall St. JRaymond Duray-11/12/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):