SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Speedfam [SFAM] Lovers Unite !
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3736 42 0 SFAM
Emcee:  AJ Berger Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2986 IN the AMAT conference call Morgan stated that they were gaining market share aMichael Dunn-5/13/1998
2985 For those who missed it, here is the AMAT earnings release blurb on its CMP ordQ.-5/13/1998
2984 Mr. Sam, What do you make of the CMP aspect of today's AMAT press release?Donald B. Fuller-5/13/1998
2983 Anyone seriously following this thread should probably also follow the "SeSteve Patterson-5/13/1998
2982 I think any buyout offer from NVLS would have to minimally match the price of tSemiBull-5/12/1998
2981 We may be looking at a classic double bottom, the first of which occurred in MaDaniel P. Dwyer-5/12/1998
2980 <Surely the total CMP market did not grow 60%. If we are lucky the total CNiek Luijtjes-5/12/1998
2979 ....or is this 60% growth at the expense of IPEC and SFAM. Surely the total CMMichael Dunn-5/12/1998
2978 Anybody see this from AMAT's earnings announcement today: It looks positiNevin S.-5/12/1998
2977 <<For all we know, Samsung might be pissed off at Parks, and SFAM gets noSemiBull-5/8/1998
2976 >>For all we know, Samsung might be pissed off at Parks, and SFAM gets noDonald B. Fuller-5/8/1998
2975 For all we know, Samsung might be pissed off at Parks, and SFAM gets no sales fDaniel P. Dwyer-5/7/1998
2974 <<Dr. Park, a 14-year veteran of the semiconductor industry and formerly SemiBull-5/7/1998
2973 Following was on Business Wire today with a time stamp of 4:31P.M. Maybe it wilPaul Moerman-5/7/1998
2972 <<Layoffs don't encourage the stock market when they are done becauseSemiBull-5/6/1998
2971 I took a different tack and sent them an email. Here was the response from IR:William N. Kammer-5/6/1998
2970 Not all semi-equip companies announce layoffs right away. The company I am witGrand Poobah-5/6/1998
2969 Mulifat, <<I do not understand why all you folks continually speculate aSemiBull-5/6/1998
2968 I do not understand why all you folks continually speculate about layoffs. Why MULIFAT-5/6/1998
2967 GP, If SFAM were to have had layoffs, they would have announced them. How manSemiBull-5/5/1998
2966 I'll put a positive spin on the layoff news. Speedfam is preparing for a pJohn F. Poteraske-5/5/1998
2965 From the 8/97 10K: At May 31, 1997, the Company had 513 full time employees inJonathan Edwards-5/5/1998
2964 A few musings about the layoffs: The posts on Yahoo seem legitimate, but who kGrand Poobah-5/5/1998
2963 Most likely today's weakness is because an analyst, I believe from Smith BaMULIFAT-5/5/1998
2962 I don't know whether the stock is reacting to a layoff rumor or not. But iGrand Poobah-5/5/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):