SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Politics for Morons – Thread Moron Political Annex
An SI Board Since May 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
326 10 0
Emcee:  Tom C Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
301I hereby nominate Grainne for her proposal of ethnic cleansing on a global scaleOeconomicus-7/24/2005
300I seconded this one on the other thread. Thought I'd "first" it heOeconomicus-7/21/2005
299Victim ordered to wed rapist By Shaikh Azizur Rahman July 19, 2005 BOMBAY -- Hlongnshort-7/19/2005
298<i>"Surely a healthy step in that direction would be simply to stop &one_less-7/19/2005
297Can you fight an idea? By Mona Charen July 18, 2005 One was a young father of alongnshort-7/19/2005
296<i>"or the sound of one hand clapping?"</i> I heard that,one_less-7/15/2005
295No. If there are no laws, we get to hang you and nobody can do anything about iLazarus_Long-7/15/2005
294Agreed.jlallen-7/12/2005
293He behaved on his own. He and he alone owns responsibility for his actions.one_less-7/12/2005
292The man accused of killing Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh confessed to a Dutch colongnshort-7/12/2005
291I second that.one_less-7/12/2005
290right he is an extremist nut. It is his kind for whom the words 'corrupt'one_less-7/12/2005
289Muslim scholar: Killing civilians OK Head of Islamic center in London responds longnshort-7/12/2005
288I hereby nominate Soupy for not realizing that threatening to kill and dismemberOeconomicus-7/12/2005
287A hate crime that wasn't By Michelle Malkin July 9, 2005 The grievance indulongnshort-7/10/2005
286<i>it was legal- -by definition.</i> If there are no laws, isn'Tom C-7/7/2005
285That was rather a stupid question, wasn't it? Obviously oi the SC made a deLazarus_Long-7/7/2005
284Yes...it was a nation of laws then....and no...there was no taint... J.jlallen-7/7/2005
283Screw the UN, I say we just do it, using force if need be. As far as I am concerone_less-7/7/2005
282Report: Islamic Group Claims London Blasts foxnews.com The statement was publishlongnshort-7/7/2005
281I have no idea how the First Amendment fits into this debate about the talk showone_less-7/7/2005
280What are you looking for? Condemnation of the acts? Ok, but why are you singlione_less-7/7/2005
279still no word on the CAIR website about the London terrorist attacks ! longnshort-7/7/2005
278<i>"I don't think that..."</i> Glad to hear it. SerioOeconomicus-7/7/2005
277A slightly hyperbolic comment about a ruling that does seem to raise troubling qOeconomicus-7/7/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):