SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
MGI Pharma MOGN New patents, anti cancer
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1826 45 0 MOGN
Emcee:  Mark Oliver Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
301 Wo! Talk about piquing interest! You seem to know something about the mechaniscaram(o)uche-10/2/1997
300 Richard In addition to the knowledge and perspective you bring to this thread,David Cathcart-10/1/1997
299 Mike Sorry, I defend this drug so strongly. But I feel and have posted severaseminole-10/1/1997
298 <<While it may not be a "cure all," it is conceivable that it cMichael Burry-10/1/1997
297 David, <<If you get a chance to see the slides showing the effects of thbocaburgerman-10/1/1997
296 Winston I have seen enough of the data from MGI-114 to accept the fact that itDavid Cathcart-10/1/1997
295 Winston Don't believe anything you can't see or explain yourself. Humaseminole-10/1/1997
294 Mike Sure, aspirin is toxic. What I am saying is that I believe that this drugseminole-10/1/1997
293 Richard, Like I said before, it seems that with the Phase I trials hitting it&#bocaburgerman-10/1/1997
292 Richard, You and I may have different perspectives on this. When I say toxic cMichael Burry-10/1/1997
291 Mike Just some more general opinions: <<<MGI-114 is not the cure allseminole-10/1/1997
290 Michael Thanks for the post Michael. On this thread at this time, there is noDavid Cathcart-10/1/1997
289 Just some more general opinion: The oncology field is about to explode. We areMichael Burry-10/1/1997
288 David and Winston <<there is reason to believe that MGI-114 is not too seminole-9/30/1997
287 Winston I called Lori Weiman after reading your last post. She said that the David Cathcart-9/30/1997
286 Winston Here is a link to get you started understanding clinical trails. rex.seminole-9/30/1997
285 Mark Don't dismiss what you started. I too made big gains in Merck (2.5x)seminole-9/30/1997
284 Interesting to see that you've all taken so much interest in the thread. NMark Oliver-9/30/1997
283 David, Another good sign is that some of the artificial saliva manufacturers arbocaburgerman-9/30/1997
282 Beating it to death with a stick? No, I meant that *my* analysis just usually scaram(o)uche-9/30/1997
281 Rick: Thanks for expounding on the natural saliva issue. I was hoping that youDavid Cathcart-9/30/1997
280 David, I was just seeking to confirm the numbers used in the market potential bocaburgerman-9/30/1997
279 Miljenko, I do feel like a picky nag questioning everything discussed in the pabocaburgerman-9/30/1997
278 Expanding on "far superior". Saliva contains HUGE quantities of IgM scaram(o)uche-9/30/1997
277 To all: I am bit a concern why all this sales number projection for Salagen saMiljenko Zuanic-9/30/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News