SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
IMDS nasdaq bulletin board
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4122 23 0 IMDS
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3022 Quote from Miami Herald on February 22, 1999: "Despite the fact that IDS kenita-3/29/1999
3021 Station Listings: Florida This is the schedule for the first of twelve airingsgao seng-3/29/1999
3020 Quote from Miami Herald on February 22, 1999: "IDS never disclosed that, kenita-3/29/1999
3019 Quotes from Miami Herald on February 22, 1999: "In April, 1998, IDS said kenita-3/29/1999
3018 lol gao seng-3/29/1999
3017 Labrador, I think Wally left out a crucial part of the Valey Kamolov story. kenita-3/29/1999
3016 >>>I think the problem is rampant among American Corporations. If you Labrador-3/29/1999
3015 lol, aas-scan for the lintro-scan reminds me of the slamogram mamogram Rust ngao seng-3/28/1999
3014 Speaking of Lintroscan and it's "x-ray-free, painless mammography"Andrew Abraham-3/28/1999
3013 btw, short ge current skinny is nbc head wants to be spun off to capitalize ongao seng-3/28/1999
3012 Critics Demand: 6-.... Executive salaries should be cut back to 1996 levels andgao seng-3/28/1999
3011 Critics Demand: 5. An independent shareholder committee that is NOT controlledgao seng-3/28/1999
3010 Critics Demand: 4. Grable should surrender the anti-dilution protection which gao seng-3/28/1999
3009 The arguement is going as: Critics Demand: 3. Grable should surrender the DOUBgao seng-3/28/1999
3008 2a.) If it is in the 10-K, why are you saying it was never disclosed? the abovgao seng-3/28/1999
3007 Thee is no reason to doubt this because it is stated in their 10-K. In the secgao seng-3/28/1999
3006 I chose the name RonaldReagan as a slug at Andrew It is a well known fact thatgao seng-3/28/1999
3005 >>> I believe JWK was speaking the truth, that Deb O'Brien did sajwk-3/28/1999
3004 Royalties -- even if there are no sales, I read the agreement to say that GrablLabrador-3/28/1999
3003 Lab, there are no revenues. Doubling royalties on zero revenues amounts to zergao seng-3/28/1999
3002 By the way, the prior post on the minimum $250,000 in the second year was from Labrador-3/28/1999
3001 If there are no objections, I will take the time to reply to these demands, regao seng-3/28/1999
3000 Am I missing something on the royalty rate doubling. The response was 2 x 0 =Labrador-3/28/1999
2999 The current 10-K specifically states that they are working on an adjunct technogao seng-3/28/1999
2998 Thought some of you may like to read my reply to GoalPro on Raging Bull: <iAndrew Abraham-3/28/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):