SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS/USRX
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1384 5 0 COMS
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
309 jharper, <<I'm starting to wonder if there wasn't some type of tEric Prigge-2/28/1997
308 Scrapps, I've can't seem to locate any info. on the aol field trials oPat Buglak-2/28/1997
307 Now that was an ignorant statement Hassell! We haven't been told yet what Scrapps-2/28/1997
306 OK everybody, let's do the "Limbo Rock" Cha, Cha, Chawilliam miller-2/28/1997
305 Hassell take a break and catch your breath! You're going to hit over-post Scrapps-2/28/1997
304 I'd like to hear from anyone who is running at 56K on x2. How did the instScrapps-2/28/1997
303 Scrapps, <<but I just can't comment because I don't know enough ying-2/28/1997
302 The Boston Globe- Friday Feb 28, 1997 3Com, U.S. Robotics stocks pummeled NetwCraig Anderson-2/28/1997
301 Coms keeps sinking. ANyone heard any news? How low does this thing have to goSteven Angelil-2/28/1997
300 Steve.....Bid 58 5/8 at 9:43. Hold your nose. This stinks! Based on 34 3/8 BID Linda Pearson-2/28/1997
299 Linda, >What we need are more reasonable positive comments! At this pointHassell Anderson-2/28/1997
298 Steve: my quick take on the concensus (here and elsewhere) - yesterday was theSawtooth-2/28/1997
297 I know, I am shocked too. It looked for sure it was going to open down again wSteven Angelil-2/28/1997
296 ALL....9:30 59 3/4 - 59 7/8 B/A UP!?! Wouldn't it be nice..... LindaLinda Pearson-2/28/1997
295 Gopher: I know what you mean - exactly. What I find amusing is how many peoplSawtooth-2/28/1997
294 Hassell, I agree with your comments re: research, make own decisions, don'tLinda Pearson-2/28/1997
293 Andre, I would vote no for the merger. Based on all the numbers it would seem tLinda Pearson-2/28/1997
292 I know Adrian. It looks like another day to turn off the computer early and goSteven Angelil-2/28/1997
291biz.yahoo.com The story at the above address should have an impact today if theJohn F. Dowd-2/28/1997
290 Premarket indication for USRX Ask 58 1/2 Coms 34 1/4 It looks like another fAdrian Overstreet-2/28/1997
289 Paul: Maybe all the downgrades are to shake loose the weak holders so that theSawtooth-2/28/1997
288 jharper, >>I'm somewhat embarrassed after shooting my mouth off to mthe dodger-2/28/1997
287 dodger-- you've got my vote... Cant see much more downside to COMS.. This lCraig Anderson-2/28/1997
286 Eric, I'm starting to wonder if there wasn't some type of tax advantajharper-2/28/1997
285 Steve, >What's the general consensus? Is this sell off overblown? Does Hassell Anderson-2/28/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News