SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MTIC - Is this the next EMC?
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3748 35 0 MTIC
Emcee:  David Farnham Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3098 "FWIW, Earningswhispers.com just posted a big fat .00 for MTI's last QMark T. Heath-1/10/1999
3097 You like storage and backup? How about momentum on real earnings? What do yougmccon-1/10/1999
3096 Maybe I should go on more vacations. Stop watching for a week and look what MTBostonView-1/10/1999
3095 Boy, now this one is more in line with what I would call as "class" iNick-1/8/1999
3094 Wow, it's official now. Every company in this industry with the exception Mark T. Heath-1/7/1999
3093 Or, the street is buying what they are making in their newly expanded garage whNick-1/6/1999
3092 Meth lab? Naw. Rumor is their taking my advise and selling junk over the inteMark T. Heath-1/6/1999
3091 Up 17%. See, I told you they were running a meth-lab. gmccon-1/6/1999
3090 Well the nice thing about today is that investors had a chance to take some promunsters-1/6/1999
3089 Wow, this is a nice pop today on real good volume. Traded over 369,000 shares Mark T. Heath-1/6/1999
3088 "I thought the financial service companies were kicking butt. A little melMark T. Heath-1/6/1999
3087 Ah, come on Greg. It ain't that bad. Mark T. Heath-1/6/1999
3086 You don't know this company. They're probably moving from some guy'gmccon-1/5/1999
3085 You know this issue as well as anyone. Are consecutive Q's of .04 and .06 ggmccon-1/5/1999
3084 I thought the financial service companies were kicking butt. A little melt downmunsters-1/5/1999
3083 Just read the STK release. Looks like the same old stuff; making it, but can&#Mark T. Heath-1/5/1999
3082 No I didn't. Thanks for the lead. I'll go check into it and see if I Mark T. Heath-1/5/1999
3081 But there's always a good stock-play out there. BTW, did you see STK preangmccon-1/5/1999
3080 "Then again, let's just get some EMC and forget about it." So noMark T. Heath-1/5/1999
3079 Let me know if you can't see the smoke and mirrors in this piece. On BXH, gmccon-1/5/1999
3078 Now the wait to see what is announced in a couple of weeks. Could it be that tNick-1/5/1999
3077 Perhaps a good sign that BXH is alone in its troubles: biz.yahoo.com Can it bMark T. Heath-1/5/1999
3076 "Box Hill said the lower revenues were particularly evident in the financiMark T. Heath-1/4/1999
3075 BXH pre-announces (and they are down on the day) while no word on MTIC yet otheNick-1/4/1999
3074 What a mistake - what a lesson this one was for me. Bought this one at $7 - wajkb-12/31/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News