SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Storage Technology- STK
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
560 16 0 STK
Emcee:  peter spinner Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
310 How do you see the DOJ's ruling affecting IBM's future funding for R&amstock bull-12/28/1997
309 just for conversation... monday should see a strong up market as the problems ipaul goldstein-12/28/1997
308 IMO, the recent drop in STK's stock was caused by a combination of the SEA stock bull-12/28/1997
307 In one of the many news releases from IBM/STK, there was a statement that said stock bull-12/28/1997
306 I too would be interested in an explanition of that comment. I think the settlm33806-12/28/1997
305 IT WOULD APPEAR TO ME THAT ALLOWING STK TO SELL ICEBERG TO OTHER COMPANIES WOULicanpickem-12/27/1997
304 Can anyone quantify the DOJ ruling as related to STK? That is, how will the rulstock bull-12/21/1997
303 There is no question that DOJ has done real harm to STK and it was totally withWTSherman-12/19/1997
302 TO ALL....Has everyone had a chance to read the ruling from the DOJ on the IBM stock bull-12/19/1997
301 I saw that 40,000 go by at about 59 and high change. Now we have news on doj cm33806-12/18/1997
300 well, it looks like they have a seller of 40 thousand shares at 60 even. that spaul goldstein-12/18/1997
299 Paul, I do not think you are dreaming at all. Unless some world event trashes m33806-12/17/1997
298 wednesday morning three days to go all over this friday at four p.m. on the decpaul goldstein-12/17/1997
297 Well, so much for the uptick. I think we are seeing the institutions (although stock bull-12/15/1997
296 NASTY ARTICLES ABOUT TECHNOLIGY in papers over the weekend. still, stk has no epaul goldstein-12/15/1997
295 true what you say. but, i allways go back to my thinking hat.. they are buying paul goldstein-12/14/1997
294 I too have scanned all the info I can find to see what's going on and the oWTSherman-12/13/1997
293 godd thinking. remember too, they bought back several million shares so far, spaul goldstein-12/13/1997
292 The three point drop seems to be a lack of buyer caused by the overall tech wrem33806-12/13/1997
291 i had sold all my stk stock and calls last month. thursday and friday i got bacpaul goldstein-12/13/1997
290 GWM and ALL: No posting since Dec. 8. Where have the STK stockholders gone? Anstock bull-12/12/1997
289 Since IBM is the major sales channel for alot of STK's products now, the maWTSherman-12/8/1997
288 Why would IBM want to by STK? What do they have that IBM doesn't and why noDiamondhead-12/7/1997
287 I sure agree than IBM would love to own STK, the problem for them and the stk sm33806-12/6/1997
286 This sure is a quiet thread for a stock that's up more than 200% over two yWTSherman-12/6/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News